Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 24 September 2007 13:18 UTC
Return-path: <mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnpG-0001Ws-5H; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:14 -0400
Received: from mpls by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnpD-0001WD-Vj for mpls-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:11 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnpD-0001VW-5I for mpls@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:11 -0400
Received: from esc91.midphase.com ([216.104.33.66]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnpC-0000aK-FX for mpls@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:10 -0400
Received: from esc91.midphase.com ([216.104.33.66] helo=LC1.labn.net) by esc91.midphase.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1IZnp9-0007YO-CL; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:07 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:00 -0400
To: jpv@cisco.com
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
In-Reply-To: <46F775D1.80608@pi.se>
References: <46F775D1.80608@pi.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc91.midphase.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Message-Id: <E1IZnpD-0001WD-Vj@megatron.ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
JP, (co-authors), I have some minor questions and some feedback on the draft. See below. > TE LSPs signalled with zero bandwidth that are configured and > provisioned through a management system are not included in the count > that is reported. Two questions WRT the above: - Why are such LSPs excluded from reporting? - How is the above accomplished for signalled LSPs? section 3.1: > The Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MUST > appear at most once within [...] and section 3.2: > The Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MUST > appear at most once within [...] While your intent is pretty clear, the phrasing is a bit awkward and subject to misinterpretation (i.e., what does it mean for an "OPTIONAL" element to "MUST" appear ). How about rephrasing along the lines of (change marked in asterisks): "The Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MUST ***NOT appear more than*** once within [...]" >4. Elements of procedure > > An implementation MAY decide to implement a dual-thresholds mechanism > based on the number of unconstrained TE LSPs to govern the > origination of updated OSPF LSA or ISIS LSP. [...] Should either define or point a reference that defines "a dual-thresholds mechanism". >5. IANA Considerations > > IANA will assign a new code point for the newly defined IS-IS Number > of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV carried within the TLV 22 (suggested > value =18). > > IANA will assign a new code point for the newly defined OSPF Number > of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV carried within the Link TLV (Type 2) > of the Traffic Engineering LSA (suggested value=18). Both suggested values are already assigned. That's it! Lou At 04:31 AM 9/24/2007, Loa Andersson wrote: >Working Group, > >this is to initiate a two week working group last call om >draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-06.txt. > >The working group last call ends eob Oct 8. > >Please send your comments to the working group mailing list. > >Loa and George > >-- >Loa Andersson > >Principal Networking Architect >Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 >Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 >Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se > loa@pi.se > >This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. >http://www.astaro.com > > > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@lists.ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpl… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] working group last call fordraft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf… Lou Berger
- RE: [mpls] working group last call fordraft-ietf-… Attila Takacs
- Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf… JP Vasseur
- Re: [mpls] working group last callfordraft-ietf-m… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] working group last callfordraft-ietf-m… JP Vasseur