Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 10 June 2020 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C8E3A0EC7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57MqllXdMIlm for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364A03A0EB3 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [122.2.97.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 384F1323375; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:22:39 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20200603102000.31C90F40751@rfc-editor.org> <25ca1341-454d-854e-8724-f60df98c0bdb@pi.nu> <CAG4d1rfLGzNNF9z+pf8tQ7tXkJDT-_+ZFnL_G95gwZzJo=gsPg@mail.gmail.com> <98D20EBF-C509-4AFE-B4CD-4079D4AA9C60@cisco.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <e08f714e-562b-fb6d-b4de-8fe83c0e23ba@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:22:36 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98D20EBF-C509-4AFE-B4CD-4079D4AA9C60@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9v-KUPsclnrs2CABVyBozsTaEH0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:22:51 -0000

Acee,

I don't think we are adding /correcting the normative language. The only
thing that is done is correcting the naming of one of the flags.

/Loa

On 09/06/2020 22:14, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Is there an IETF policy for adding/correcting normative language via an 
> Errata? I guess this is allowed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Acee
> 
> *From: *mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas 
> <akatlas@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM
> *To: *Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
> *Cc: *"mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>rg>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" 
> <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>om>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
> 
> Sure
> 
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:48 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu 
> <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
> 
>     All,
> 
>     I think this errata in essence is correct, though I would want to
>     propose a slight modification to the Corrected Text.
> 
>     On 03/06/2020 18:20, RFC Errata System wrote:
>      > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4090,
>      > "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels".
>      >
>      > --------------------------------------
>      > You may review the report below and at:
>      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6203
>      >
>      > --------------------------------------
>      > Type: Technical
>      > Reported by: Mihir Amrelia <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com
>     <mailto:mihiramrelia_89@yahoo..com>>
>      >
>      > Section: 6
>      >
>      > Original Text
>      > -------------
>      > If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR
>     SHOULD try to
>      > provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR
>     SHOULD then try
>      > to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > Corrected Text
>      > --------------
>      > If the "Bandwidth Protection Desired" flag is set in
>     SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, the PLR
>      > SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not
>     feasible, the PLR
>      > SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the
>     full bandwidth.
>      >
>      >
> 
>     Slightly Corrected Text
>     --------------
>     If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE,
>     the PLR
>     SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible,
>     the PLR
>     SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full
>     bandwidth.
> 
>     Note 1: lowercase is how the document treat all othr names of flags in
>     flowing text.
> 
>     Note 2: with this slight change I think this Errata could be verified
>     and held for a document update.
> 
>     /Loa
> 
>      >
>      > Notes
>      > -----
>      > Correcting flag info to consider bandwidth protection.
>      >
>      > Instructions:
>      > -------------
>      > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>      > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>      > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>      > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>      >
>      > --------------------------------------
>      > RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07)
>      > --------------------------------------
>      > Title               : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP
>     Tunnels
>      > Publication Date    : May 2005
>      > Author(s)           : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed.
>      > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>      > Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
>      > Area                : Routing
>      > Stream              : IETF
>      > Verifying Party     : IESG
>      >
> 
>     -- 
> 
>     Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>
>     Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail
>     Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64