Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 10 June 2020 03:22 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C8E3A0EC7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57MqllXdMIlm for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364A03A0EB3 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [122.2.97.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 384F1323375; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:22:39 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20200603102000.31C90F40751@rfc-editor.org> <25ca1341-454d-854e-8724-f60df98c0bdb@pi.nu> <CAG4d1rfLGzNNF9z+pf8tQ7tXkJDT-_+ZFnL_G95gwZzJo=gsPg@mail.gmail.com> <98D20EBF-C509-4AFE-B4CD-4079D4AA9C60@cisco.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <e08f714e-562b-fb6d-b4de-8fe83c0e23ba@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:22:36 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98D20EBF-C509-4AFE-B4CD-4079D4AA9C60@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9v-KUPsclnrs2CABVyBozsTaEH0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:22:51 -0000
Acee, I don't think we are adding /correcting the normative language. The only thing that is done is correcting the naming of one of the flags. /Loa On 09/06/2020 22:14, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Is there an IETF policy for adding/correcting normative language via an > Errata? I guess this is allowed. > > Thanks, > > Acee > > *From: *mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas > <akatlas@gmail.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM > *To: *Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> > *Cc: *"mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" > <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > *Subject: *Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203) > > Sure > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:48 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu > <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote: > > All, > > I think this errata in essence is correct, though I would want to > propose a slight modification to the Corrected Text. > > On 03/06/2020 18:20, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4090, > > "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6203 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Mihir Amrelia <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com > <mailto:mihiramrelia_89@yahoo..com>> > > > > Section: 6 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR > SHOULD try to > > provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR > SHOULD then try > > to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth. > > > > > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > If the "Bandwidth Protection Desired" flag is set in > SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, the PLR > > SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not > feasible, the PLR > > SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the > full bandwidth. > > > > > > Slightly Corrected Text > -------------- > If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, > the PLR > SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, > the PLR > SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full > bandwidth. > > Note 1: lowercase is how the document treat all othr names of flags in > flowing text. > > Note 2: with this slight change I think this Errata could be verified > and held for a document update. > > /Loa > > > > > Notes > > ----- > > Correcting flag info to consider bandwidth protection. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP > Tunnels > > Publication Date : May 2005 > > Author(s) : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed. > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching > > Area : Routing > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > -- > > Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu> > Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail > Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203) RFC Errata System
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6… Alia Atlas
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6… Loa Andersson