[mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 21 December 2013 10:55 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E41AD79D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:55:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxoUTDt34tMl for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BCF1AD68D for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.136.170.1] (unknown [124.127.168.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F30F91800740; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:55:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52B573AA.4060208@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:55:38 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "Ryoo, Jeong-dong" <ryoo@etri.re.kr>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:55:50 -0000
Working Group and Editors, Over the last two weeks I've had the opportunity to discuss draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu with people with different background. The reaction is mainly very positive :). However, there is one feedback that I get consistently, there is a rather high threshold when starting to read the document. Even though we taken steps to point out that the specification heveily depends on RFC 6378, I thin we should make this explicit. I propose that the add a sentence early in the inroduction, something like "The reader of this document is assumed to be familiar with RFC 6378. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
- Re: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-… Huub helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-… Loa Andersson