Re: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu

[Huub helvoort <[e-mail]>]

Hello Loa,



Thank you for testing the appreciation of this draft.



If it helps, I have no objection to add your proposed sentence.



Best regards, Huub.





Huub van Helvoort, 海高明
Senior Consultant, 高级顾问
Huawei Technologies Ltd, 华为技术有限公司 - European Research Center, 欧洲研究所
Karspeldreef 4, 1101CJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: [phone]   Mob: [phone]

--
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique... just like everyone else...

________________________________
From: Ryoo, Jeong-dong [[e-mail]]
Sent: 23 December 2013 03:16
To: Loa Andersson; Eric Gray; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu

Loa, thanks for letting us know of the response from people with different background.
I also appreciate your attention on this document.
In my opinion, your proposal is quite considerate.

Jeong-dong



________________________________
From : "Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]>
Sent : 2013-12-21 19:55:49 ( +09:00 )
To : Eric Gray <[e-mail]>, Ryoo, Jeong-dong <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc : [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject : Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu

Working Group and Editors,

Over the last two weeks I've had the opportunity to discuss
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu with people with different background.
The reaction is mainly very positive :).

However, there is one feedback that I get consistently, there is
a rather high threshold when starting to read the document. Even though
we taken steps to point out that the specification heveily depends on
RFC 6378, I thin we should make this explicit.

I propose that the add a sentence early in the inroduction, something
like "The reader of this document is assumed to be familiar with
RFC 6378.

/Loa
--


Loa Andersson email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: [phone]