Re: [mpls] Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Huub,

I think this is one of those things tht don't help much once it is
there, but can hurt quite a bit if missing :).

/Loa

On 2013-12-24 04:20, Huub helvoort wrote:
> Hello Loa,
> 
> Thank you for testing the appreciation of this draft.
> 
> If it helps, I have no objection to add your proposed sentence.
> 
> Best regards, Huub.
> 
> Huub van Helvoort, 海高明
> Senior Consultant, 高级顾问
> Huawei Technologies Ltd, 华为技术有限公司 - European Research Center, 欧 
> 洲研究所
> Karspeldreef 4, 1101CJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> Tel: [phone]   Mob: [phone]
> 
> --
> ================================================================
> Always remember that you are unique... just like everyone else...
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Ryoo, Jeong-dong [[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* 23 December 2013 03:16
> *To:* Loa Andersson; Eric Gray; [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* RE: Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu
> 
> Loa, thanks for letting us know of the response from people with 
> different background.
> I also appreciate your attention on this document.
> In my opinion, your proposal is quite considerate.
> 
> Jeong-dong
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From : *"Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]>
> *Sent : *2013-12-21 19:55:49 ( +09:00 )
> *To : *Eric Gray <[e-mail]>, Ryoo, Jeong-dong 
> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> *Cc : *[e-mail] 
> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] 
> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject : *Additional comment on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-tu
> 
> Working Group and Editors,
> 
> Over the last two weeks I've had the opportunity to discuss
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu with people with different background.
> The reaction is mainly very positive :).
> 
> However, there is one feedback that I get consistently, there is
> a rather high threshold when starting to read the document. Even though
> we taken steps to point out that the specification heveily depends on
> RFC 6378, I thin we should make this explicit.
> 
> I propose that the add a sentence early in the inroduction, something
> like "The reader of this document is assumed to be familiar with
> RFC 6378.
> 
> /Loa
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: [phone]

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]