Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Mon, 15 August 2016 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432ED12D5B2; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xw5zUiNjBEeF; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE9F12D795; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id d196so24330316wmd.0; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSucaWWznJIOcCWDenzuGVcP88o+k4nv10KcA0UBELk=; b=MgVyPFvJwuxYwEUxRtizP/Ng3vLkG8j9EuMZTkDnhfzzy3HVCgWHVob/wQ9HKfXY+c lB56luYOHFnsUIYq6jRTIoE/6J2jxfAjB/I7cugWsXyb12p5EqwowXFFD4F929/rF+gN d0iV7NNAx+LrpgjgM54889mumzTGHRNMWauwNQGrI2er9df03+aoUBgC9q+qAXGDyinH oZrgR4xYN86OeGP0xMxHoGFHlEWQhEeJAekssi7woW6uQtMzBfCmhKdpSWdzZ+re8UI0 muj7CPUDqLZc3PED88Vfu0HFf1uim/fKMf2r7EaJgjIpnW7PedpIlseueeE+91pGJgj8 3PzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSucaWWznJIOcCWDenzuGVcP88o+k4nv10KcA0UBELk=; b=eObnRkmiBzfryLI06NusP/TvHgW+VICUi/e23e96zXnbfjPHql1QgqbnN9YvcLtvxp Uud6CwyHfSRsGix0dj7swv0rYiPPWbQS2roYaPyywxsLDXbJWcmPTJBtOzy8KGTgjME7 EK0fxaIBVo1iJRs5OYaiuuLE+pHKMxiQZWLUyhCGg365VLB5Xs88VHeaZrn6SUx81hKS O2vEB7MJxPB9GEdYigbtKjlO9sS/Aoflw1OH74RemkzjE1m/lNAcM3R01pODeFfb7Q1J //cmVfpqIwbIe9n1TUlYcSvRb+U63uqxGGyutStKlxfJKJg/f/0PYuHH5i6s24GC9MiX tWvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvCwNZ+NAvJ/6QjXtY2LZVK9oE3OjFzQFc1Udd5B7HMT7rK9LRVwUwKM63Iwjt99A==
X-Received: by 10.28.139.144 with SMTP id n138mr17914495wmd.71.1471301156481; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm23600559wjd.15.2016.08.15.15.45.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
References: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A883507@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4f5ae21c-de9e-ef89-658e-b3efbc829578@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:45:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A883507@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/EUmeJSUnLgzk_fC7cuhnuFPsaAM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:46:00 -0000

I support progressing this draft.

Cheers, co-author, Huub van Helvoort.

------
On 15-08-16 16:31, Eric Gray wrote:
> MPLS Working Group,
>
> I am the document shepherd for the following draft:
>
> "MPLS-TP Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology”
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection
>or
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection)
> – draft version 02.
>
> This E-Mail is to initiate a two week working group last call on the
> above draft.
>
> Please send comments to the MPLS working group mailing list
> (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
>
> There are IPR disclosures for the individual draft that this
> document replaced.
>
> They can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection
>
> All the authors and contributors have stated that they are not aware
> of any additional IPR related to this draft.
>
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about working group discussion related to IPR disclosures.
>
> Please remember that discussion on the content and validity of IPR
> disclosures should not take place on IETF mailing lists.
>
> However we are looking for simple statements as to whether or not
> you support continued working group effort to progress the document,
 > regardless of existing IPR disclosures.
>
> Please include this information when making comments, or indicating
> your “support/do not support" when responding to this working group
 > last call.
>
> Note that the IETF works on the basis of “rough consensus” – hence,
> unless you are convinced that a significant number of other
 > participants will have similar objections, it may be in your best
 > interest to provide any comments you may have on this Internet Draft,
 > even if you do not support progressing this draft further.
>
> This working group last call ends Monday, August 29, 2016.
>
> --
>
> Eric Gray


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...