Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02

[Huub van Helvoort <[e-mail]>]

Hello Eric,

You wrote:

The below is my comments (as document shepherd) for the Working Group Last Call on 
this draft.

Comments:

I support progression of this document after addressing a number of issues.

As you may have noticed we, the editors/authors, have addressed your issues
and uploaded a new version of the draft (see below).

The main updates are:
-1- reduction of the number of authors to 5
-2- the referencing to RFC5654 has been improved
-3- the concern regarding the presence of different protection modes is
       removed by including a statement that all nodes in the ring MUST be
       provisioned in the same protection mode.
       To detect possible misconfiguration two bits are used in the RPS PDU
       that identify the protection switching mode which allows detection of
       any mis-configuration during provisioning.

If you agree with these updates the document can be progressed.

Best regards, Huub.


-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03.txt
Date:	Sat, 01 Oct 2016 06:16:10 -0700
From:	[e-mail]
To:	[e-mail]
CC:	[e-mail]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching of the IETF.

        Title           : Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology
        Authors         : Weiqiang Cheng
                          Lei Wang
                          Han Li
                          Huub van Helvoort
                          Jie Dong
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03.txt
	Pages           : 47
	Date            : 2016-10-01

Abstract:
   This document describes requirements, architecture and solutions for
   MPLS-TP Shared Ring Protection (MSRP) in a ring topology for point-
   to-point (P2P) services.  The MSRP mechanism is described to meet the
   ring protection requirements as described in RFC 5654.  This document
   defines the Ring Protection Switch (RPS) Protocol that is used to
   coordinate the protection behavior of the nodes on MPLS ring.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03" rel="nofollow">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/" rel="nofollow">ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...