IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-01

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com> Tue, 28 January 2014 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC30F1A0232 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nJfHvpHccMY for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com (maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com [IPv6:2001:470:88e6:3::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804CE1A021A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harbor3.ipv6.occnc.com (harbor3.v6ds.occnc.com [IPv6:2001:470:88e6:3::239]) (authenticated bits=128) by maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0SIEj7H015626; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:14:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from curtis@ipv6.occnc.com)
Message-Id: <201401281814.s0SIEj7H015626@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
To: Eric Osborne <eric.osborne@notcom.com>
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:59:06 -0500." <CA+97oKN7W7sWLhaZEOkiHRs6o2ZvkTQ7_dChnd+MG_=iQN2p4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:14:45 -0500
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@ipv6.occnc.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:14:55 -0000

In message <CA+97oKN7W7sWLhaZEOkiHRs6o2ZvkTQ7_dChnd+MG_=iQN2p4w@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Osborne writes:
 
> Sure, I can make that change, although I think it reads better if I
> forego expansion in favor of reusing the title from rfc6378.
>  
> The current title is "Updates to PSC".
> "Updates to Protection Switching Coordination" looks clunky, IMO.
>  
> What about "Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection"?
>  
> eric


That works.  It is actually better since it includes the title of the
RFC you are updating.

Curtis


> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com> wrote:
> >
> > In message <52E63702.20102@pi.nu>
> > Loa Andersson writes:
> >
> >> Working Group,
> >>
> >> This is to initiate a working group last call on
> >> draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates.
> >>
> >> One reason for the timing, other than that the author thinks is ready
> >> for wglc, is that this document is normatively referenced in
> >> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu which also is in wglc.
> >>
> >> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> >>
> >> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
> >>
> >> This working group last call ends Feb 19´0, 2014.
> >>
> >> /Loa
> >> for the MPLS wg chairs
> >
> >
> > The title needs to spell out PSC since there are three interpretations
> > of the acronym in IETF, the other two predating this one by many
> > years.
> >
> > Otherwise looks good.
> >
> > Curtis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email