IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-01

Eric Osborne <eric.osborne@notcom.com> Tue, 28 January 2014 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.osborne@notcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC71A03FE for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jVXoYOW3DxF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF94D1A022A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so438699oag.9 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XypHc1YuBHt1bXcDu0Y+lsFs5EAQM8OCtE/wG3KVw0s=; b=XKoyKcm00r/SsXqp06Q8wKeRBdwC0vnSmHVhuaz77Pz3XG8iUdT+fTIqixEHeDnJun 2yRGneNhCV0BmS9Nj51gLwPSvz8gPYiDzlMan8IolGTNUXhQF1TF4L9CiKFOVswC8ysf ziFtoeDra6moomh7X7tPaHgyrj4i9OMEoTAi/7q/osgACBcoByeOc1lgWuqF5qH/vtfc F7C3z4wKCPeTpEieVv7lZFCY0YgD9PAchWKa226YD9Ad5hBMUtIbryDIChZnaWhQXl0q Nm79IccgIFMdWSilylBr3n0ILV7b0q4exdi0+9M6odSTzw1N9iP74G5AO69FM2v0NVVp pHdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJJpCbp8qObi0ZM9Lm/FhERpdZ5fv4wpb+l/mxIdeKGKNt+1v6bdKS9PwE9MWAzSSddaGt
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.157.130 with SMTP id wm2mr1217704oeb.31.1390917546214; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.135.229 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:59:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201401272305.s0RN5Zxx095713@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
References: <52E63702.20102@pi.nu> <201401272305.s0RN5Zxx095713@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:59:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+97oKN7W7sWLhaZEOkiHRs6o2ZvkTQ7_dChnd+MG_=iQN2p4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Osborne <eric.osborne@notcom.com>
To: curtis@ipv6.occnc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:01:30 -0800
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:59:13 -0000

Sure, I can make that change, although I think it reads better if I
forego expansion in favor of reusing the title from rfc6378.

The current title is "Updates to PSC".
"Updates to Protection Switching Coordination" looks clunky, IMO.

What about "Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection"?



eric


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Curtis Villamizar
<curtis@ipv6.occnc.com> wrote:
>
> In message <52E63702.20102@pi.nu>
> Loa Andersson writes:
>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This is to initiate a working group last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates.
>>
>> One reason for the timing, other than that the author thinks is ready
>> for wglc, is that this document is normatively referenced in
>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu which also is in wglc.
>>
>> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>>
>> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>>
>> This working group last call ends Feb 19´0, 2014.
>>
>> /Loa
>> for the MPLS wg chairs
>
>
> The title needs to spell out PSC since there are three interpretations
> of the acronym in IETF, the other two predating this one by many
> years.
>
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> Curtis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email