Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-01

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Eric,

This was Curtis' comment, but personally I have no problem changing
the title as you have suggested.

/Loa

On 2014-01-28 21:59, Eric Osborne wrote:
> Sure, I can make that change, although I think it reads better if I
> forego expansion in favor of reusing the title from rfc6378.
>
> The current title is "Updates to PSC".
> "Updates to Protection Switching Coordination" looks clunky, IMO.
>
> What about "Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection"?
>
>
>
> eric
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> In message <[e-mail]>
>> Loa Andersson writes:
>>
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> This is to initiate a working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates.
>>>
>>> One reason for the timing, other than that the author thinks is ready
>>> for wglc, is that this document is normatively referenced in
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu which also is in wglc.
>>>
>>> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>>>
>>> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([e-mail]).
>>>
>>> This working group last call ends Feb 19´0, 2014.
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>> for the MPLS wg chairs
>>
>>
>> The title needs to spell out PSC since there are three interpretations
>> of the acronym in IETF, the other two predating this one by many
>> years.
>>
>> Otherwise looks good.
>>
>> Curtis

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]