Re: [mpls] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Adrian, Loa, and Mark, for the responses.

> I don't know how much more I have to after Adrian's mail, it seems
> cover the issues.

It does.  And, yet, your message does add a useful comment:

> We never had the ambition to find every gap, but believed that
> that documenting for the future that we made the effort and also that
> the gaps we found would be a good enough idea.
>
> I differ from Adrian on one point, I think it is very likely that we'll
> find new gaps, however they will be few and with low impact.

That's a good answer, and thanks for adding that.  Mark's comment is
also helpful:

> I would support a wiki, as that can be edited by the group
> at anytime, and anything in the wiki that makes sense to add
> into an IETF draft or RFC can help ensure the drafts/RFC's
> have the most pertinent information, and don't end up
> getting unnecessarily bloated.

That's a perfect use of the working group wiki, and that should take
care of the question entirely.

Off to change my ballot now...

> As for the references I agree that it is possible to take a pass on
> them

OK.  I'm sad about that, but not terribly so: as I said, I think it
would be helpful, but not so important for this document.  So carry
on, and thanks again for the good responses.

Barry