Re: [mpls] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> Sun, 23 November 2014 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909411A014F; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:02:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cf4xzinqwEEI; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5B71A0146; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>) id 1XsYg6-0005i2-F2; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:02:18 +0200
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Organization: SEACOM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:02:14 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; )
References: <20141123064914.2745.26911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <058901d006ec$2add7770$80986650$@olddog.co.uk> <5471F00D.8010401@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <5471F00D.8010401@pi.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3788065.yCvQbXh2GK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201411231702.18031.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bsLbQyC3MDDfj6fA2mMwO1LyB5Q
Cc: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org, 'Barry Leiba' <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:02:40 -0000

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 04:32:45 PM Loa Andersson 
wrote:

> This begs the question how we'll maintain the management
> of the gaps and the recommendations around for each gap
> should be done. An idea that has been circualted it to
> use a wiki page, but so far there is no decision. But -
> as our ADs have said - with a wiki we don't really need
> a decision, just someone that takes on the task to do
> it.

I would support a wiki, as that can be edited by the group 
at anytime, and anything in the wiki that makes sense to add 
into an IETF draft or RFC can help ensure the drafts/RFC's 
have the most pertinent information, and don't end up 
getting unnecessarily bloated.

Mark.