Re: [mpls] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-06.txt

...

All nits have been addressed.
I went with 'the Administrative Group sub-TLV' in the abstract.  For
section 2, I reworded the first paragraph as:

   This document defines the Extended Administrative Group (EAG) sub-TLV
   for both OSPF [RFC3630] and ISIS [RFC5305].

eric

>
> Nits:
>
> o Abstract
>   It says:
>   "the Administrative Group sub-TLV of the Link TLV"
>   Precisely speaking, I think this should be:
>   "the Administrative Group sub-TLV of the Link TLV for OSPFv2/OSPFv3
>    and of the Extended IS Reachability TLV for ISIS"
>   Or this could simply be:
>   "the Administrative Group sub-TLV"
>
> o Section 1, 3rd paragraph
>   s/vaues/values
>
> o Section 2
>   "This document defines a sub-TLV of the Link TLV for both OSPF
>    [RFC3630] and ISIS [RFC5305] ... "
>    Same as above (comment for Abstract).
>
> o Section 2.2
>   "the existing Administrative Group TLVs" should be:
>   "the existing Administrative Group sub-TLVs".
>
> o Section 2.3.2, 3rd paragraph
>   "as the assumption is than an unadvertised bit is set to 0"
>   I guess "than" should be "that".
>
> Thanks,
> Tomonori Takeda
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls