IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADB51AE11A; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:51:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oANByb7vVI-F; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154B21AE08E; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1W1AOt-0007Zj-Ra; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:51:36 +0000
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:51:33 +0900
Message-ID: <m2d2k1a8ze.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346B0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026EF305B4@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346B0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Thu_Jan__9_16:51:26_2014-1"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, mpls@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, david.black@emc.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, jnc@mit.edu, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:51:55 -0000

> Because they specify zero UDP checksums,
> I oppose publication of draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp in its current form
> I oppose tsvwg adoption of draft-yong-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap in its current form.
> I oppose the IETF lisp documents.

lloyd,

i think i understand your position.  but i disagree with preventing wg
adoption of draft-yong-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap, mainly because i strongly
see wg adoption as how we get to discuss and work on a document, not as
approval of the document.  as david said, i think we need to discuss it
so we can decide if it should be fixed.  to do so, we have to adopt it.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email