IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Thu, 09 January 2014 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A71AE06F; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 00:09:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gG1Cmobgtscu; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 00:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA661AE06D; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 00:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.245.230.131:54618] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 39/23-26128-E195EC25; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:09:02 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1389254942!29878430!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.31]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 31345 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2014 08:09:02 -0000
Received: from exht011p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.31) by server-15.tower-78.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jan 2014 08:09:02 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.204]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.31]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:09:01 +0000
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: randy@psg.com
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:06:57 +0000
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
Thread-Index: Ac8ND6LbmabIHemQQc6QHOWUwU/54gAAiHqr
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346B5@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026EF305B4@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346B0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>, <m2d2k1a8ze.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2d2k1a8ze.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, mpls@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, david.black@emc.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, jnc@mit.edu, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:09:16 -0000

Randy,

okay, let  tsvwg adopt draft-yong-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap, and let's get consensus on  it. And then the authors can adopt that consensus for mpls-in-udp, which overlaps in authorship...

thanks,

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: Randy Bush [randy@psg.com]
Sent: 09 January 2014 07:51
To: Wood L  Dr (Electronic Eng)
Cc: david.black@emc.com; gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk; ietf@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; jnc@mit.edu; lisp@ietf.org; tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)

> Because they specify zero UDP checksums,
> I oppose publication of draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp in its current form
> I oppose tsvwg adoption of draft-yong-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap in its current form.
> I oppose the IETF lisp documents.

lloyd,

i think i understand your position.  but i disagree with preventing wg
adoption of draft-yong-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap, mainly because i strongly
see wg adoption as how we get to discuss and work on a document, not as
approval of the document.  as david said, i think we need to discuss it
so we can decide if it should be fixed.  to do so, we have to adopt it.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email