Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

Lizhong <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B041B2B56; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gj0dIgICNmqP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 104271B2B54; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so66984459pad.1; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EfMXioFBowWbTmJeaQTNM3/ANznU/8baCHQq6j/FBPo=; b=sL32K6fo8llb4GxTtvJqfVOgNGBVF3S8CflYpGQwUwPmnaHTRT/Oz/SFXKfEUs/w9u ydNsdTYKaajofOvhp2MJ9IaR/vWzhjTRTwymwDspkveytVdptskss+K81AJTYsPB4T3c PueGXiW2Z+d5fElqehhzM4tXZIfDXqCdMldxVmmiDo/H9sJ7piPfDmkPZ80rX0Lcrxwf ZqvovYkuYXnJ2y9ihpgZGH0GBr53QQ/ZiCwJUSfUB7rNKTnjLKGz6RtZMk2RodgLmJbD cfLGrmOzKstFJchgpIKf4zRYJt990Bpv1cf9GzMyshYIHnmCMckh8bpL9zbJOKN9KxMO 2EWQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.139.231 with SMTP id rb7mr10332854pab.5.1443685792673; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([58.217.245.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16sm4842712pbu.37.2015.10.01.00.49.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=cp936
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Lizhong <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13A344)
In-Reply-To: <560C51E9.60804@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:50:00 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F6B7F8D-C5A6-445F-9E71-45642600E2E4@gmail.com>
References: <20150930124330.1948.32154.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAH==cJwSx51qXJ7f29tWDHa9xfuGXd_dze=UizLW3jFEf-0xYQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2319C15.1226DC%swallow@cisco.com> <560C51E9.60804@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Uw5hm18BOS1Hg8TrS3nc1xSB_R8>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:49:54 -0000

Stephen, George,
Thanks, will update accordingly.

Regards
Lizhong

> 在 2015年10月1日,05:19,Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> 写道:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30/09/15 19:50, George Swallow (swallow) wrote:
>> Lizhong, Stephen,
>> 
>> Perhaps less in more!
>> 
>> 
>>  Destination Address Offset: the offset in octets from the top-of-stack
>>  to the destination address entry.
> 
> That might be better yes. Maybe with a forward pointer to the 4.x
> sections that clarify it.
> 
> S
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Lizhong –
>> 
>> There are several places in the draft where the term "destination address” should be "destination address entry”
>> 
>> It would also be good to add a column to the table on page 6 indicating the size of each entry
>> 
>> Null              4
>> 
>> IPv4      8
>> 
>> IPv6    20
>> 
>> George
>> 
>> From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com<mailto:lizho.jin@gmail.com>>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 11:57 AM
>> To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>>
>> Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org>>, "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
>> Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
>> 
>> Hi Stephen,
>> See inline below. Thanks.
>> 
>> Lizhong
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:
>> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> - 3.2: The description of the destination address offset isn't
>> clear to me. If this is some common thing in MPLS though, that's
>> fine. If not, maybe it'd be worth being clearer here.
>> (It does become clear later though, so this is a nit.)
>> 
>> [Lizhong] I read several times, and try to make it more clear as below:
>> 
>> Destination Address Offset: an offset (octets) to indicate the
>>      position of the Relayed Address Entry which is also the
>> 
>>      destination address of the Reply or Relayed Reply message.
>> 
>>      E.g., to point the first entry on the top of the Stack of
>> 
>>      Relayed Addresses will have offset of 0, and to point to
>> 
>>      the second entry will have offset of the length of the first entry.
>> 
>>