IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Update to the bullets on the first page of my review of draft-song-mpls-extension-header-09

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Thu, 08 September 2022 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21D9C1524B1; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7syZhczpsQom; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4666CC1522AD; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id y136so13103480pfb.3; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=SVBBJrusD41xWrzhMQ0eSd+JJdvslQ3Mye7mk4NT1K0=; b=jvuTQXhi3zB5pEHKklV6slnoTWzfT+Y8zPSQ/CvGJeapG8PJxiHitV3OkOrU9sjGGQ 3BsbPH95EZQdCBH4RsGVExYwI8z9/YjUigQnVVW8Jgw9FOTWebq25R8lxNRkQYnXq9D3 z6W//dJApNguVHIiOGOPZxYolOs4DRw+VCfzUaKDMARVDlqu1kg1xgHG9WJy2RNXjLt/ ZDQMalwpz9Ck/9V9oU9t5KFIQQ1VKIdm6WLMMgH77CqqPIrzUo6qFcCur3TAKd4ZuY+A pVy128DPKuZyxAOUKXRGx6bjnBsgQDiX8BPBZFvYU4sPcGgXDyMK/kEflk3iX7+A2GOY CzAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SVBBJrusD41xWrzhMQ0eSd+JJdvslQ3Mye7mk4NT1K0=; b=abTgTbm8MtwIdt1Ahw7F89rOseAZxgft5rqVcRtKSp6BxIuBiM6THcCvNMjK68ieub va9KT2fJCZAXP3a3hgGswwp3Z3lbVwHj72BjW4Q4Ds1+iUVmwrKX6EqULL/scr+lvdsy 01dofjT9n+qNyK6IAjaiB06/tcZI352GlKTnkabgrW+fDnr0ZSD1pPWBd3XwSmZPxEeH XcA072jBgB8nAfw5hzw9VZFnPXIBhfHCsUULBnENJEW0fqGd6yaaJgOF50Rj/0We53h8 HqXpKPLafI6c4VmdvV5Ycs3wJ6b2fV/9DGZIHJ5vHsqeg4vV/ft8wPD45ZLckllAnnvS jh8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3Lxuc6VKswmXm7rNPOnpths6oNbbXXwR3tbvaAgKM9lMY1+o6w OxuiDuDR4KPD3im/N9FEoVM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4OV7OzMhTlw+7uHdoE/iE+UY2aF3i6HvXQEtPz6pWp68ctV+QhqsqhBUbnk9r4HVueStpAGA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f0e:0:b0:438:5cd8:8d60 with SMTP id f14-20020a631f0e000000b004385cd88d60mr1868633pgf.70.1662646183646; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23-20020a1709026e1700b00177ec9ee533sm2371443plk.151.2022.09.08.07.09.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <67e02989-b305-7a5d-3d2e-ac569c6a4a84@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:09:40 -0700
Cc: John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-song-mpls-extension-header@ietf.org" <draft-song-mpls-extension-header@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <351ED344-003D-4FD7-8292-605DC5FF318D@tony.li>
References: <98356ad3-ec52-3a5c-ee31-1ee604d4b5db@pi.nu> <dc03203bf7ee49caafccdb70221edc1a@huawei.com> <b718cd04-c822-b744-0ca2-9c3e47ea2f62@pi.nu> <BY3PR13MB47879BAD2537E77C1D6193F89A799@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <33185189-08e3-71da-123c-2f17fe5ad0bb@pi.nu> <BY3PR13MB47878BDBE64EE739BA4F5DF99A799@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <5A840AB5-7B0F-4C21-B0B0-700194B03A32@tony.li> <BY3PR13MB478797DB5335413F94621C219A799@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <06759C2A-CA9D-4957-8203-D71BAFA1AB67@tony.li> <c5820e62-b4ed-d88a-d738-16ee52088342@pi.nu> <200451CE-9554-4298-BB9C-2EB4B63D843F@tony.li> <4F01E812-4BF5-4808-B21E-063577A47E4F@juniper.net> <E46FD1E3-04C9-44D1-AEEF-8588BA647841@tony.li> <67e02989-b305-7a5d-3d2e-ac569c6a4a84@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/W4KKPA2s1GL7S4yw2GhXnh3C2xI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Update to the bullets on the first page of my review of draft-song-mpls-extension-header-09
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:09:46 -0000

Loa,

This could go in either document.  However, I see no need for redundancy.

Tony


> On Sep 8, 2022, at 2:20 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Tony,
> 
> I'm fine with your proposed text for the framework.
> 
> What I don't understand is why we should not add something to the requirements also.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> On 2022-09-05 19:13, Tony Li wrote:
>> John,
>>>  Should we also add that the definition of a network action MUST specify its interaction with all other currently defined network actions?
>> You want deterministic semantics too? :-)
>> I can live with that.  Revised text:
>>    For MNA to be consistent across implementations and predictable
>>    in operational environments, its semantics need to be entirely
>>    predictable. A solution MUST specify a deterministic order for
>>    processing each of the Network Actions in a packet. Each Network
>>    Action must specify how it interacts with all other previously
>>    defined Network Actions.
>> Tony
> 
> -- 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email