Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr
Ravi Torvi <pratiravi@gmail.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 23:27 UTC
Return-Path: <pratiravi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8403A0FBA; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0rHo1OBxjDT; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5613A0FB9; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id b23so577030vsp.9; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WY3Kaf71LyYY6jGJwiqH/oYGdZquZfniUmj9RAcP5RQ=; b=j2CL2twzD6I8SuN8ew01Q611WmMrtKJ/Rjhc3hzOphSys4rGq+G1mKAqCE6g4fw75H 8usKbf2x0oQDw0epskPYEZeQsXA2SxH0vBToJp01J09WKvE3e2dsY2+SRGMjUaSMWnx0 G0mOJtGthVXbnSvu4f++O9LUjklpq3ysDG4QzfmaxUcJOZTcI07DdArCw5Gj9sPsEQIg iFiT+GYuprxO/9cOXf46o+BoOGwHPPq6Xf7pgkqtn5XjofMED9hO1xd5uTkdv0EYg6oX H4bEKhPTbqa4rKqvEjHiZutZhMqSpi7BLxCcInJdU4tMneCcfnTCfPdRnw1+UlAaGGtL zoNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WY3Kaf71LyYY6jGJwiqH/oYGdZquZfniUmj9RAcP5RQ=; b=OvEvfy5HXEaq0NkQIlQSvdhUSw6DcrhBpfhEgdDfzXy3g9uERFa5wBMdFNL5uj/z4q zxUPDlnKvP0KjwrHHY44B10tH64Hzb9zoQInm+kX6N88e7O09zqnQeAH2/JP0rhCH42d JFySA/7gYx3otKmyCNespgJuBg9fV2HnO0w3qEE6pHEHEl8y43ucwKWAMNo7WCHgEV/O ZXrHBh2MPkQcn2rsS21jq6jgLR19IjQOyghObRy0mg6ktUw6ywuDtBmw2DVYX/MszFaH hDW9oD2OAykaYGg25UzYjSmxQHA2cp3uQ33uzElZoqN/9/ztUNt+ff3GoY0WgSKtrh7B 8FBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320ZWM+B5zi3UQEkep6cgUHgd9eH41KItfMyJ6HL8g/dooi5jzW kdka0AYKOxojAu58Rii0tdlAp7gboATXbhT5sseHFK0Qtus=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIJBDE+fXM7QFvgB07Nafez6NZ8/VgqiS2e1+xGwSOIuLYJ9So8LxA2d/4a4ct+yITD5THoJIFsWpstTv1JP8=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7993:: with SMTP id u141mr2405857vsc.21.1608766068694; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1b7d7573-d3d6-6f62-001b-998a6e8e65f7@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <1b7d7573-d3d6-6f62-001b-998a6e8e65f7@pi.nu>
From: Ravi Torvi <pratiravi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:27:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHAy71vRT4wM5Tf089njP5KrjPWkLatd5XKidCofdhuSOSmNvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d266605b72a0a0e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XVc_heOkWpdLsOd3wM63y2TPtQQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:27:51 -0000
Hi Loa, and WG Chairs, >>If draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were made an Experimental document >> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is needed and will actually be deployed? Yes. >>- do you have the cycles to contribute to progress and review the document? Yes. >>- are there interest to progress the document in this fashion? Yes. Regards, Ravi Torvi Juniper Networks Inc. On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:07 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote: > Working Group, > > This is to start a "two week" poll on publishing draft-ietf-mpls-rmr as > an Experimental RFC. > > Mid-September the responsible AD sent draft-ietf-mpls-rmr back to the > working group. The direct reason was that there did not seem to be any > interest by the authors to respond to the IESG review. > > The working group chairs took the action start a poll in the working > group to see if there were interest (in the wg) to continue progress the > document. > > There were no other responses, than from the two authors, to this poll, > and the wg chairs agree that there are no documented interest to > progress the draft in the current format. > > The logical action would have been kill the draft. > > However, we have been asked id we could make the document Experimental. > Obviously this will generate problems with down refs and code point > allocation. But after carefully going through the documents, with some > innovative writing it the Shepherds Write-Up, this could be managed. > > Please respond to the following questions. > > If draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were made an Experimental document > > > - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is needed and will actually be > deployed? > > - do you have the cycles to contribute to progress and review the > document? > > - are there interest to progress the document in this fashion? > > /Loa > for the MPLS wg chairs > > -- > > Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu > Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com > Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr Loa Andersson
- [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Ravi Torvi
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-i… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-i… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-i… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-i… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Chandrasekar Ramachandran
- Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-i… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Abhishek Deshmukh
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Colby Barth
- [mpls] R: [EXT] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making dr… Di Giglio Andrea
- Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls… Loa Andersson