Re: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr

[LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <[e-mail]>]

Hi Loa, all,

I support (as co-author) to progress this draft as experimental.

Regarding the proposed questions:

- do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is needed and will actually be
   deployed?
Answer - draft-ietf-mpls-rmr addresses a specific but largely common topology scenario in current operational networks, which is the ring structure present in backhaul / aggregation networks. Thus, it intends to provide enhancements on the provision, operation and reconfiguration of LSPs there, which can be highly beneficial for operators.

- do you have the cycles to contribute to progress and review the
   document?
Answer - From co-author perspective, the document has addressed all the received comments. If further comments are received, I can commit cycles to address them

- are there interest to progress the document in this fashion?
Answer - From both co-author and operator perspectives, yes.

Apologies for the long time to answer, I was in vacation period.

Best regards

Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Shraddha Hegde <[e-mail]>
Enviado el: jueves, 7 de enero de 2021 9:30
Para: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
Asunto: RE: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr

Loa,

RMR provides a good solution for the ring topologies And I support publishing as experimental RFC.

Rgds
Shraddha


Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 10:38 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [mpls] MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Working Group,

This is to start a "two week" poll on publishing draft-ietf-mpls-rmr as an Experimental RFC.

Mid-September the responsible AD sent draft-ietf-mpls-rmr back to the working group. The direct reason was that there did not seem to be any interest by the authors to respond to the IESG review.

The working group chairs took the action start a poll in the working group to see if there were interest (in the wg) to continue progress the document

________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição