Re: [mpls] Closed - Working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-multipath-use

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Curtis,

the working group last is not a door that is shut and no more comments
allowed after closing.

It is rather a door that is opened to notify that now is an excellent
time to comment on a specific draft since he authors will be focused
on updating the draft.

Please go ahead and make the changes you have indicated below; once all
updates are down, re-post and let me know and I will go ahead with the
publication request procedures.

/Loa

On 2013-11-12 08:41, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> Loa,
>
> Although WGLC is over I reread draft-ietf-mpls-multipath-use and found
> three editorial changes that should be made.
>
>   OLD SENTENCE
>
>     Alternately, the need for requirement MP#1 can be eliminated if
>     every MPLS-TP LSP can be created by the MPLS-TP ingress makes use
>     of an Entropy Label Indicator (ELI) and Entropy Label (EL) below
>     the MPLS-TP label [RFC6790].
>
>   NEW SENTENCE
>
>     Alternately, the need for requirement MP#1 can be eliminated if
>     every MPLS-TP LSP created by an MPLS-TP ingress makes use of an
>     Entropy Label Indicator (ELI) and Entropy Label (EL) below the
>     MPLS-TP label [RFC6790].
>
> The above change is s/can be created by the/created by an/.  The
> original sentence was understandable but grammatically wrong.
>
>   OLD SENTENCE
>
>     For those LSP that are larger than component link capacity, their
>     capacity are not increments of convenient capacity increments such
>     as 10Gb/s.
>
>   NEW SENTENCE
>
>     For those LSP that are larger than component link capacity, their
>     capacity are not integer multiples of convenient capacity
>     increments such as 10Gb/s.
>
> The above change is s/increments of/integer multiples of/.  Again the
> intent was clear in the original sentence but the wording was wrong.
>
> In the implementation section (which will be removed by IESG) the one
> change is s/mpls mailing list/MPLS mailing list/.
>
> I was unable to submit immediately after last call ended due to the
> IETF-88 submission blackout period.  Hence the delay in submitting.
>
> If the above editorial changes are OK with the WG chairs, I will
> submit the draft with the changes from the WGLC (define acronyms
> before use) and with these changes.
>
> Curtis
>
>
> In message <[e-mail]>
> Loa Andersson writes:
>>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This working group last call has been closed.
>>
>> We have seen very few comments (1), and that comment is editorial.
>> However we believe that it is nevertheless reason to go ahead and
>> start the process to have the draft published as an RFC.
>>
>> Can the authors please address the comments, make sure the commenter
>> is comfortable with how the comments been addressed, and if necessary
>> post a new version of the draft.
>>
>> /Loa
>> for the mpls wg chairs
>>
>>
>> On 2013-10-12 20:02, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> this is to start a two week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-multipath-use-02.
>>>
>>> Please send your comment to working group mailing lists ([e-mail]).
>>>
>>> We did an IPR poll on this document prior to starting the wglc.
>>> The authors responded to the IPR poll that he is not aware of
>>> any IPR's relating to this document.
>>>
>>> There are no IPRs disclosed against this document.
>>>
>>> However, the data-tracker identifies one IPR disclosure (# 1593), but
>>> this IPR was disclosed against an earlier document that this document
>>> replaces; the author has indicated that one reason why the earlier
>>> document were replaced was to avoid the IPR.
>>> This happens because we mark the documents with a replaced by info,
>>> the IPR tracker tool uses this link to find IPR disclosures, but
>>> IPR is not always continued over a link that indicate replacement.
>>>
>>> The working group last call will end Friday October 25, 2913.
>>>
>>> /Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]