Re: [mpls] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-11: (with COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

Thanks all. I think it would be useful to capture the rationales provided by Deborah, Loa, and Stephane in the shepherd write-up for future reference.

Alissa

> On Jul 4, 2018, at 5:42 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> 
> Hi Alissa,
> 
> The document has a long history in the WG. There was a lot of discussions it  as part of the WG discussions, and the document was respinned multiple times with multiple editors. All the listed authors have provided text and/or main concepts in the document and we cannot really kick one out with the level of contribution provided. We already have a contributor list for people who have actively contributed but with a less significant amount of contribution.
> That would be great to do an exception here regarding the author list size.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Stephane
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 19:09
> To: The IESG
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-11: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Is there a justification for this document having more than five authors,
> rather than one or two editors?
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>