Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00

["Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]>]

Qin,

Thanks -- that is a fair comment. I'd suggest also to add one more thing:

'Note that all the sub-registries in [IANA-MPLS-OAM] are moved from "Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM)
Parameters" registry.  The IANA is therefore requested to remove
the "MPLS OAM" registry.'

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:25 PM, Qin Wu <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,all:
> I have read draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00.
> One comment I have is section 2.3, last bullet said:
> "
> All the sub-registries are moved from "Multiprotocol Label
> Switching (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM)
> Parameters" registry.  The IANA is therefore requested to remove
> this registry.
> 
> "
> It looks this paragraph are also applied to sub-registries in the PWE Registry although
> this paragraph only left aligns with MPLS OAM Registry bullet.
> 
> To avoid confusion, I suggest the following change
> "
> Note that all the sub-registries in [IANA-MPLS-OAM] are moved from "Multiprotocol Label
> Switching (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM)
> Parameters" registry.  The IANA is therefore requested to remove
> this registry.
> 
> "
> Then this paragraph can left align with the first paragraph in the section 2.3.
> 
> Besides this, I think this draft is ready to go for publication.
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:33 AM
> To: Ross Callon; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
> 
> This working group last call ends in two days. However, to this point we have only one reply (from Andy Malis -- thanks Andy). 
> 
> Please review the document and respond. If you think that the document is fine a simple "support" is sufficient, but the document cannot progress unless there is some WG support. 
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> 
> PS: If you think that you have already replied and you are not Andy, then let me know and include "draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries" in the subject line. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Callon [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 7:40 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
> 
> Working Group;
> 
> This is to start a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00.txt.
> 
> Please send your comment to the working group mailing list ([e-mail]).
> 
> We did an IPR poll on this document in September. The authors each responded to the 
> IPR poll that they not aware of any IPR relating to this document. There are no IPRs 
> disclosed against this document.
> 
> The working group last call will end Wednesday December 18, 2013.
> 
> Ross
> (as mpls wg co-chair)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls