Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00

Agree, thank for addressing my comment.

Regards!
-Qin
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:55 AM
To: Qin Wu
Cc: Ross Callon; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00

Qin,

Thanks -- that is a fair comment. I'd suggest also to add one more thing:

'Note that all the sub-registries in [IANA-MPLS-OAM] are moved from "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM) Parameters" registry.  The IANA is therefore requested to remove the "MPLS OAM" registry.'

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:25 PM, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi,all:
> I have read draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00.
> One comment I have is section 2.3, last bullet said:
> "
> All the sub-registries are moved from "Multiprotocol Label Switching 
> (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM) Parameters" 
> registry.  The IANA is therefore requested to remove this registry.
> 
> "
> It looks this paragraph are also applied to sub-registries in the PWE 
> Registry although this paragraph only left aligns with MPLS OAM Registry bullet.
> 
> To avoid confusion, I suggest the following change "
> Note that all the sub-registries in [IANA-MPLS-OAM] are moved from 
> "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Operations, Administration, and 
> Management (OAM) Parameters" registry.  The IANA is therefore 
> requested to remove this registry.
> 
> "
> Then this paragraph can left align with the first paragraph in the section 2.3.
> 
> Besides this, I think this draft is ready to go for publication.
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:33 AM
> To: Ross Callon; mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on 
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
> 
> This working group last call ends in two days. However, to this point we have only one reply (from Andy Malis -- thanks Andy). 
> 
> Please review the document and respond. If you think that the document is fine a simple "support" is sufficient, but the document cannot progress unless there is some WG support. 
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> 
> PS: If you think that you have already replied and you are not Andy, then let me know and include "draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries" in the subject line. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Callon [mailto:rcallon@juniper.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 7:40 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: working group last call on 
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
> 
> Working Group;
> 
> This is to start a two week working group last call on 
> draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00.txt.
> 
> Please send your comment to the working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
> 
> We did an IPR poll on this document in September. The authors each 
> responded to the IPR poll that they not aware of any IPR relating to 
> this document. There are no IPRs disclosed against this document.
> 
> The working group last call will end Wednesday December 18, 2013.
> 
> Ross
> (as mpls wg co-chair)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls