IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 23 March 2016 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7B412D57D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7BIIbggDm2l for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0734.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0EE12D71F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/r45nqax4bynfg/EPJwmjT+9IqM+ItNbFzzO5Svbju8=; b=TprOosdI5GN4MW5oGx1r2QOSdzw4I0EeLKICmTNlj8QzGrR4/vMC6GPC25Q9LceqgowSlSgSh2QMxj5xE7h0ENbsc2iSeFN2UZ+d1zRNyhGkhneA+ShB5PKbBokfZWpkZH7+ynVTGlnnIfnBAuYiYC1HpB93GN+K7lLp45/fBFw=
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1986.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.12; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:46 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0443.015; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:46 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdGFDYJvzOpZ6BbxTD2LOnYJ8T0PNw==
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:46 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB1985B4AEB8DDEAB7D14AF915AE810@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0b15421d-810c-4503-f4d9-08d35324a651
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1986; 5:y/8ylphmgtrXxPI5WQMwnuHTTfJut2WVsD4MgGzJQ6XXshDKGkhLV2EQYSSQmt/Et1J63CA7TkZTGHtZeKp3rsfnrLezkbP4IgMJx+hcg11ic1Kfl4d5MXS963O3Hz3NuGS9jGI5Xt6kOvo93jClfw==; 24:sk2lemEBMOxjvNtsRnq3XfW7mWW6fhi+BwEL2QN4Q+xWnQ2ZMUTS4indsVNQ8wKQ7Adb1k80EGCmKH+vAiWTvoUau849gBPtxq4DiqSq/Uc=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB19867777E5041827E57F141BAE810@BLUPR05MB1986.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986;
x-forefront-prvs: 08902E536D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(164054003)(3846002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(6116002)(76576001)(5008740100001)(5002640100001)(87936001)(66066001)(102836003)(110136002)(107886002)(1220700001)(122556002)(2501003)(5640700001)(81166005)(586003)(2906002)(1096002)(230783001)(50986999)(512954002)(74316001)(450100001)(54356999)(5003600100002)(92566002)(3280700002)(10400500002)(11100500001)(5004730100002)(1730700002)(189998001)(2351001)(33656002)(77096005)(99286002)(3660700001)(2900100001)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1986; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Mar 2016 14:08:46.2125 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1986
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bBKk2xM-O1E1SEEWYOQzksZRA08>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:20:46 -0000

Ross,

I agree with Adrian's statement, below.

                             Ron

> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:34:36 -0000
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: "'Ross Callon'" <rcallon@juniper.net>, <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on
> 	draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
> Message-ID: <064501d17bbc$49f36110$ddda2330$@olddog.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Ross, thanks for this notice.
> 
> I need to read the IPR referenced by the disclosure, but pending that, I do
> not support this document going forward in its current state.
> 
> I think it is important for the working group to seek to develop solutions that
> either completely unencumbered by IPR or that is available on free-to-
> implementers terms. It may turn out that this is not possible with the
> disclosed IPR, but I think the WG should try.
> 
> For the avoidance of doubt: I am not making any comment on the IPR-
> holder's rights to impose whatever license they want, and I am not asking
> them to vary their terms.
> 
> I do not that it would be convenient if the IPR holder updated the disclosure
> to show that it applies to the current WG draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email