Re: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Wed, 14 August 2013 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4449911E8103 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28y6vxsdLNbB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D47C11E80FF for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8864; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1376448797; x=1377658397; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=w2KMNAttR+vOrppTi60qkREPfY88EgcWrlCrFGThH4U=; b=lO20v7kLJ7nozzv5pX3sCjJqqtc+AoiwDSUImb0XlTxOEu0kkQuMremX TTPkfbJmhk1QVd0WnSXJ6WuqNNvEwgBrC/iCCqcyHytauCX7nunzYZEOI 0OIbYO2CTnF3DqMuSWyvbI8Pxysoj1RCKggNFJX7bj1dqdDg07gDxWWOp 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FAKfwClKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENVC+YoElFnSCJAEBAQMBAQEBawsFCwIBCA4UJCcLJQEBBAENBQgBBYd8Bgy4VJALLQQHgxt2A5AWgS6XcYMbgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,874,1367971200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217"; a="247110365"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2013 02:53:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7E2rFRa021914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:53:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.110]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:53:15 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "loa@mail01.huawei.com" <loa@mail01.huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
Thread-Index: Ac6YUkBh7zV9g+sGRCSLJd3RtsoDnwAcRPgA
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:53:14 +0000
Message-ID: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED322DFE5CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <5efa5403aab843bdbcc382a8143640ee@BLUPR05MB070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <5efa5403aab843bdbcc382a8143640ee@BLUPR05MB070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.108.150]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C34100D5-D55A-438F-B1D9-E6782DAB9F72"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll for Adoption draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:53:22 -0000

I believe that fixing and organizing misplaced number registrations is useful and worthwhile as it prevents future confusion, and typically welcome clean-ups.

However, I do not support adoption of draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00 in its current form.

The document solves a small part of the potential source of confusion, and, to me, it should fix all potential inconsistencies or leave things as-is.

Specifically: 
draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries proposes only to move four namespaces currently in [1] from [RFC6374] into a new heading (registry).

However, there's still the following potential inconsistencies, with all these protocol elements from the G-ACH in different places:
The G-ACH Channel Types namespace, although now it's a superset of the original PW-ACH, is still titled "Pseudowire Associated Channel Types" and is hosted in the pwe3-parameters registry. [2]
Other G-ACH namespaces and assignments from [RFC6427] and [RFC6378] reside in their own mpls-oam-parameters page [3]
G-ACh Advertisement Protocol namespaces are in the pwe3-parameters registry [4] [5] [6], although these are not PWE3.
CC/CV MEP-ID TLV namespace with pwe3-parameters [7]

I would suggest that either things are left as they are, or all these G-ACH/PW-ACH namespaces are moved under a main "Generic Associated Channel (G-ACH)" registry *if* there's consensus for the clean-up.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

[1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters.xml#measurement-timestamp
[2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters/pwe3-parameters.xhtml#pwe3-parameters-11
[3] https://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-oam-parameters/mpls-oam-parameters.xhtml
[4] https://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters/pwe3-parameters.xhtml#gach-application
[5] https://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters/pwe3-parameters.xhtml#gach-tlv
[6] https://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters/pwe3-parameters.xhtml#gach-ethernet
[7] https://www.iana.org/assignments/pwe3-parameters/pwe3-parameters.xhtml#cc-cv-mep-id


On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

> This is to start a "two week" poll on adopting
> draft-andersson-mpls-moving-iana-registries-00
> as an MPLS working group document.
>  
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>  
> This poll will end August 28, 2013.
>  
> Thanks, Ross
>  
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls