Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt

Hi Min,

I am fine with the revision.

Best,
Tianran

________________________________

Sent from WeLink
发件人： xiao.min2<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>>
收件人： Tianran Zhou<zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>>
抄送： mpls<mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>;i-d-announce<i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>;Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent)<zhukeyi@huawei.com<mailto:zhukeyi@huawei.com>>
主题： Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt
时间： 2024-04-12 08:51:29

Hi Tianran,

Thanks for the comments.

Please see inline.

Original
From: TianranZhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>;i-d-announce@ietf.org <i-d-announce@ietf.org>;
Cc: Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent) <zhukeyi@huawei.com>;
Date: 2024年04月11日 17:44
Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt
Hi,

I find some texts are not clear.
1. In the introduction, paragraph 3 and 4, the use of "former" and "later" are difficult to understand. You may change another way to say.

[XM]>>> To make *the former* and *the later* more clear, some changes are proposed as below.

In paragraph 3, s/the former/the method described in this document, s/the latter/the SFL method.

In paragraph 4, s/the former/the method described in this document, s/the latter/the In-situ OAM method.

2. In section 3, you only mentions "If the edge-to-edge measurement is applied". What about the else? It sounds like, all the following text is about the edge-to-edge. Maybe, you can add something like

"Otherwise, if the T bit is 0, both transit node and egress node are the processing nodes."

[XM]>>> Note that the MPLS ingress node is also a processing node. Propose to change the text as below.

OLD

If the edge-to-edge measurement is applied, i.e., the T bit is set to 1, then only the MPLS egress node [RFC3031<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3031>] is the processing node.

NEW

If the edge-to-edge measurement is applied, i.e., the T bit is set to 1, then only the MPLS egress node [RFC3031<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3031>] is the processing node, otherwise all the MPLS nodes along the LSP are the processing nodes.

Cheers,

Xiao Min

Best,

Tianran
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> 代表 internet-drafts@ietf.org
发送时间: 2024年4月10日 9:22
收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
抄送: mpls@ietf.org
主题: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Encapsulation For MPLS Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method
   Authors: Weiqiang Cheng
            Xiao Min
            Tianran Zhou
            Jinyou Dai
            Yoav Peleg
   Name:    draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11.txt
   Pages:   17
   Dates:   2024-04-09

Abstract:

   This document defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance
   measurement with alternate marking method, which performs flow-based
   packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on MPLS live traffic.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-11

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls