Re: [mpls] Seeking feedback on I-D "MPLS-TP Linear Protection Applicability to MS-PW"

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Mon, 13 June 2011 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E721F8476; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_29=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o94Y5O8mnwRs; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ilptbmg02.ecitele.com (ilptbmg02-out.ecitele.com [147.234.242.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE28221F847F; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 93eaf2e8-b7c74ae000000a6f-b6-4df605903a4c
Received: from ILPTEXCH02.ecitele.com ( [147.234.245.181]) by ilptbmg02.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 48.2F.02671.09506FD4; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:41:52 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com ([147.234.244.212]) by ILPTEXCH02.ecitele.com ([147.234.245.181]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:43:29 +0300
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "ma.yuxia@zte.com.cn" <ma.yuxia@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:43:26 +0300
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Seeking feedback on I-D "MPLS-TP Linear Protection Applicability to MS-PW"
Thread-Index: AcwpxQYkt1VB87JDQZmWlDJG9yJyKgAABTPQ
Message-ID: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BDCA9A38@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
References: <OF7EF3F6D6.7AE4C202-ON482578AE.00430DDE-482578AE.0044404E@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF7EF3F6D6.7AE4C202-ON482578AE.00430DDE-482578AE.0044404E@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BDCA9A38ILPTMAIL02eci_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA3VTa0gUURjlzszujubUuPm4icU0UqC15WbFRq4UWRioPTGqHznOXncnd2eW mTE0iLaiAiuxpJdFL1TyUYH0frcRsWL2gJ5m/VijspAws/xhNrOT5p/+nXu+c849M3yXxK3b LEmkIKpIFjkva44mqrt7+2xVpv689CtVEx0/jrzGHW/qGkyOyt6LxAI8p7Z2AMtpvv2LWI6t C4BMThQllVMR40IK72SXy8Imji9nGcHlZO0s4/dyPPIhUXWynN+PRBebFZ2pkYLIIJGXXILo drJLVy2zORxz5tnsbNbUFHvG/OjVHkFhkM3HCV7GhxSFcyNGY/Saogu5mGJJZlQPYuTCatxz 7DrvH9hY1j64JgDqCytAFAnp2fB4uAUYOAE+eXfBXAGiSSt9A8BHH0KYcTgE4Pmmp4SuMtNO 2NLUadZxHD0T7jgajrhxOhu++9hq0TFBT4HBgV0mHY+nC2HrvtsWQ8/BS6GzuIFnwWvnnkd4 il4Gh0IfI/lWeiW88rU/oomiV8GOz/ciPNDa/Wxtxoy7EuGbrpOY0ZqGtTcf4waOh5/Dv02G Ph6+3X3hbzcJ9oT6/t4VC0NHuwhDPwHeO/uKqAIJNaNia0ZZakZZDH46PHWj12zgabD+9Bd8 GLfdDWOj+VPA0gjiBa9fLfK502fNQLygIi+awUu+FmDsz6eroKMtNQhoErAxVPBxX57VxG1S yn1BMIHE2HiqkujPs44tklzlHk7xbJBLvUgJAkjibBy1r1uTUy6ufDOSpeHRYu3v78eTxvCS vgLqhoz09P8f2ERqD/81z0q7tcUsQciP5OGcZJJkIZWtbbc1VkZuVFYseNV/Y4yM0mvEaDVy 9YqU4ud8iuA25q1gclIitUI30/rAUyqOePWXs3VoaKgbJGofPZ6y6KoYbWFH3N1aMKYF06Xf 9WDt0YyMkgLgekn44MvvzvzL49oJoXr91TkHYzvrYooLHr4I2NqXdJwJlOR+i8u5H+e8lJJV +cKfNii93ZiWO2327nzHiXUJB/IfPW8kkgu2hK4dLn3wfvvO1JU9HzBkWZu9sMsxd5K6qIdY WP/LB24eaeDaJsL2OxnWinHnOm8pq/c6mp7Zi843s4Ti4expuKxwfwDDXEeLFAQAAA==
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Seeking feedback on I-D "MPLS-TP Linear Protection Applicability to MS-PW"
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:43:34 -0000

Dear Ma and all,
Adding the PWE3 WG to my response.

The PW redundancy mechanism supports linear protection of MS-PWs as one of many additional application use cases:
Appendix A of the PW redundancy Bit draft<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/?include_text=1> describes 5 application uses cases in addition to MS-PW with single-homed CEs (which is listed there as use case 5).
And it is equally applicable to IP/MPLS and MPLS - with the help of  the Static PW Status Messages draft<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status/?include_text=1>( if, for whatever reason, you do not want  to, or cannot, use RFC 4447<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4447/?include_text=1>).

Hence I doubt the need for yet another PW redundancy  mechanism with narrow scope of applicability.

Regards,
     Sasha

From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ma.yuxia@zte.com.cn
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:25 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Seeking feedback on I-D "MPLS-TP Linear Protection Applicability to MS-PW"


Hi all,

The linear protection mechanism for LSP and PW(including MS-PW) should be the same and it is valuable to describe it clearly.

BTW, there is a typo, it is "T-PE Z" instead of "T-PE B".

 "
  Figure 1 illustrates such a scenario, where two MS-PWs are
  established between T-PE A and T-PE B, over S-PEs 1-2 and 3-4
  respectively. Each PW segment is established over an LSP (e.g. PW-
  s12 over LSP12).
 "

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Cohn
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:14 PM
To: mpls
Subject: Seeking feedback on I-D "MPLS-TP Linear Protection
Applicability to MS-PW"
Importance: High

Hi MPLSers,

I uploaded "MPLS-TP Linear Protection Applicability to MS-PW" I-D
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cohn-mpls-tp-pw-protection-00)

The abstract goes:

One of the requirements of the MPLS transport profile [RFC 5654] is
to provide linear protection for transport paths, which include both
LSPs and PWs. The functional architecture described in [SurvivFwk]
is applicable to both LSP and PWs, however [LinearProt] does not
explicitly describe mechanisms for PW protection in MPLS-TP.

This document extends the applicability of the linear protection
mechanism described in [LinearProt] to MPLS-TP segmented PWs
(MS-PWs) as defined in [RFC 6073].

Could you please review it and send feedback to the mailing list or
directly to the author?

Looking forward to your feedback,

Daniel


This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.