Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-05

[Hejia <[e-mail]>]

Hi ,

I have finished reviewing draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-05.txt as the member of MPLS Review team and have the following comments:

* Is the document coherent?

 It is close to coherent. Please take the following two comments into account when further progressing this draft.

 1. There are a few drafts referenced in this document have expired, e.g.
   [I-D.ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements]
   [I-D.ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements]
   [I-D.raggarwa-pwe3-p2mp-pw-encaps].
 
   Please check the availability of the relevant content in these drafts referenced in this document. 

 2. Section 4 Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM)
   There is an editor's note reminding the coordination work between this draft and [I-D.hmk-mpls-tp-p2mp-oam-framework]. It is better to work out the details before moving to WG adoption.  


* Is it useful (i.e., is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is the document technically sound?
 
 I believe this document is useful. One comment about Section 6: 
 Section 6 summarizes the 1+1 protection scheme for unidirectional P2MP transport paths as defined in [RFC6372]. However, some description in this section (see below) is applicable to 1:1 instead of 1+1 P2MP protection. 
 
   "Fault notification
   happens from the node idenifying the fault to the root node and from
   the leaves to the root via an out of band path. "


* Is the document ready to be considered for WG adoption?
 It is suggested to clear up the issues listed above before moving forward to WG adoption. 


* Nits

  1. Section 4 Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM)
   s/spacific/specific

  2. Section 5.2 Point-to-Multipoint PW Control Plane
  " [I-D.ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw]" at the beginning of this paragraph should be deleted.

  3. Section 6 Survivability
  s/eather/either
  s/ identifying/identifying


B.R.
Jia


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2012年8月18日 15:14
收件人: [e-mail]; Hejia; David Allan I
抄送: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Martin Vigoureux
主题: MPLS-RT Review of draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-05

Kenji, Jia, Dave;

You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-05.txt

Note to authors: You have been CC’d on this email so that you can know
that this review is going on. However, please do not review your own
document.

Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
(ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether
the document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t
have to be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).

Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and
secretary, and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments
may be sent privately to only the WG chairs.

Are you able to review this draft by Sep 3, 2012?

Thanks, Loa
(as MPLS WG chair)
-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: [e-mail]
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            [e-mail]
Ericsson Inc                          phone: [phone]
                                              [phone]