Re: [mpls] draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-00

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Wed, 04 November 2015 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=275090f9b4=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5641A889C for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_npkNLcwkxv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C1D1A6FC8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id tA41TECG017372; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:32:38 -0500
Received: from vawvcgsie2k1301.ciena.com (lin1-118-36-35.ciena.com [63.118.36.35]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1xxwetjw92-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 20:32:38 -0500
Received: from VAWVE2K13MBX02.ciena.com (10.4.156.88) by VAWVCGSIE2K1301.ciena.com (10.4.62.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:32:37 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com (10.128.6.43) by VAWVE2K13MBX02.ciena.com (10.4.156.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:32:37 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:32:36 -0500
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 20:32:34 -0500
Thread-Topic: draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-00
Thread-Index: AdEWntxZCDi6JDKdQ06V/allOy8YMgAAbqnA
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B9C821A7F@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
References: <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F283204F7B6@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F283204F7B6@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-21920.003
x-tm-as-result: No--42.568000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B9C821A7FONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-11-04_02:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1511040027
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/zkA1PT14tnSal8vXJ4kZPTzv1hg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:32:41 -0000

You meant tarek/george's draft and not esale draft

Thanks,
Himanshu

From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shahram Davari
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:30 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-00

Hi,

Although the problem the draft is trying to solve is a legitimate problem, but the solution has a number of issues:


1)      It requires ingress LER to impose a stack of labels that is potentially large. Existing HW can't currently support this and therefore this draft requires replacing all LER HW

2)      The solution requires all intermediate LSRs to support this new RSVP-TE extension.

3)      The QoS is not guaranteed. Since there is no correlation between ultimate LSP and the  DLL Stack. Since potentially many LSPs may be required to go through the same path and they will all use the same DLL stack.

4)      Switching multiple times to final LSP causes in flight packet drops and out of order delivery

5)      In a large MPLS network, There is no guarantee that the RESV message comes back with low delay.


Thx
Shahram