RE: [mpowr] Rough Strawman of MPOWR Charter

Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com> Fri, 23 January 2004 20:28 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20172 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:28:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ak7uF-00076r-8d for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:27:55 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0NKRtsR027328 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:27:55 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ak7uF-00076h-2n for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:27:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20149 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:27:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7uD-0002Rn-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:27:53 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7tI-0002Pi-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:26:57 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7sO-0002N1-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:26:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ak7sP-0006iO-6a; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:26:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ak7sC-0006gN-VP for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:25:48 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20005 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:25:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7sB-0002LC-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:25:47 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7rD-0002I6-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:24:47 -0500
Received: from smtp.exodus.net ([66.35.230.236]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ak7qF-0002EI-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:23:47 -0500
Received: from ms101.mail1.com (ms101.mail1.com [209.1.5.174]) by smtp.exodus.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0NM2gw3025061 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:02:42 -0800
Received: from ala-mrwtemp.thingmagic.com (unverified [207.31.248.169]) by accounting.espmail.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.2.5) with ESMTP id <B0017974591@ms101.mail1.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:23:16 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040123150434.044b93b8@ms101.mail1.com>
X-Sender: margaret@thingmagic.com@ms101.mail1.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:12:56 -0500
To: Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: RE: [mpowr] Rough Strawman of MPOWR Charter
Cc: mpowr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BA03B41AFFEA154B80DEB5BC9E4B65D005917A32@hq-ex-3.corp.broc ade.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the feedback!

>My first impression is that a good way to do this would be
>to create a single working group addressing the issues
>of empowerment, standards track, scalability, and
>perhaps other issues.

Others have raised similar points on this list and the
solutions list.  My thoughts differ, though...

I think of the General Area as the over-arching management
structure, with each of these (hopefully coordinated) groups
serving as a sub-project within that area.  Harald has
discussed his management methodology for the Internet area
in at least two plenaries, and he has consciously decided
to pursue a structure that consists of "small, sharp tools"
rather than a widely-scoped, long-lived process WG (like
the poised/poisson group of the past).

There has been a general trend (I think) in the IETF to
form WGs with smaller scopes and more limited charters,
using the IESG/areas to coordinate activities between many
small groups.  I don't know if this is a good trend or not,
but these changes have been made to solve problems with
wide-scoped, long-lived WGs, and I don't have a proven,
better way to solve those problems.

> > [Question:  Should we including any wording about how this
> > WG relates to the ICAR and NEWTRK efforts?]
> >
>
>There should be explicit liaison activities among these
>different activities, since a good idea in one may
>solve a problem in another.

Can you suggest wording for the charter regarding what type
of liaison activities these groups should have?

>I would suggest that you explicitly reference the draft
>"draft-ietf-problem-issue-statement-xx" and the related
>draft "draft-ietf-problem-process-xx" as source documents
>for this work.

Okay.  Do you think that we should explicitly state that this
group is charged with addressing particular parts of the
problem statement, or just provide a general reference?

Margaret


_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr