Re: [mpowr] Rough Strawman of MPOWR Charter

Margaret and Thomas,

I agree with Robert's sentiment - liasion with other general area
working groups is a good thing, and we need to do it, but trying to
keep charter text current with ongoing efforts within the general area
seems more trouble than it's worth. I think this is why we have ADs,
so that we don't have to write down all the ways that working groups
in an area have to avoid tripping over each other.

The first sentence Robert proposed was ""The working group will
determine and periodically review
the requirements for liaison with other working groups addressing
related administrative and procedural issues".

I assume that this is more like "the working group and the area
director will determine", but it seems to allow all the details that
followed without requiring changes to charter text if we find more
effective ways to liase.

Spencer

"The working group chairs of all general area working groups should go
out for kimchi on Tuesday afternoon during the most boring timeslot
available..."

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Snively" <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
To: "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Cc: <mpowr@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: [mpowr] Rough Strawman of MPOWR Charter

Try this.  Though it may be a bit more explicit than you
want in the text, we should certainly do most of it anyway.

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr