IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Exploration of a "posting" metric - draft-elkins-mtgvenue-participation-metrics

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA76612D7BD for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=o2wtCcfH; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=Qknr2NAp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqiZlTRJiOW2 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ADA12D7BB for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6LGfhD8029135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1469119308; x=1469205708; bh=qDXVsx2pOXXjB8OEmbPmuyd9qC3UI4KfmhijOt7LHfk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=o2wtCcfH1yhMJvgetJVHD8PW8mDvvD/Be3hHSE2gnMNf2B61WP+Hh0tNrtoHvuMkd J6dBrXMGygql+4McrlOxMlKKmSLNOEvp1Y+x6noO9qyZhfkPYTCTjVNhTR+z5d+hpP HL1PTyQ5MIahjjpo4XKmdN82fI7gSsUolAExd7Eg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1469119308; x=1469205708; i=@elandsys.com; bh=qDXVsx2pOXXjB8OEmbPmuyd9qC3UI4KfmhijOt7LHfk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Qknr2NApTgla6yiNdXSS2n4pXMPoOffyn7vNe5C2NUrfpVgAkSaGfAk9klm0BKC1j oyRILgj9UaRTBnJctlaY4ZARabYeDMWRnIXWPlNBQgXrwYfTgXDh91Kedgcv0t0iHN nE6r4qcy3fGN1yXmveoGyYw3QlArI+pnlSJf25VI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160721084633.076c9fc0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:33:58 -0700
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com, mtgvenue@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <796335163.2273953.1469077225963.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo. com>
References: <F4EACEAA-0255-4985-AB4B-0247085C1D68@cisco.com> <6ca7e342-87b7-fa19-1ca4-ae8fa9908c12@dcrocker.net> <616887686.2294521.1469076283917.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <d64cfd49-8776-17c1-8268-7ccbe0be7b24@dcrocker.net> <796335163.2273953.1469077225963.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/5V4--2m4pIsBJE82a6Le6N1o2N4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Exploration of a "posting" metric - draft-elkins-mtgvenue-participation-metrics
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:41:51 -0000

Hi Nalini,
At 22:00 20-07-2016, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
>I would be very interested to hear what others have to say on this 
>topic.  My experience is that in the WGs that I follow, that most of 
>the contributions have a fair amount of merit.  Of course, some more 
>than others.  And sure,every once in a while, someone makes a 
>comment that is not so great and it is, by and large, disregarded or 
>censured by the community.
>
>But, that is only my experience and only one data point.   What do 
>others think?

The difference between a person attending a face-to-face meeting and 
a person only posting to a Working Group mailing list is USD 
875.  There hasn't been a need to rate the contribution of the person 
in either of those two categories for meeting purposes.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email