IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AE8124C27 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaIKoDgPi8ZO for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8568127011 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3066; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494859322; x=1496068922; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Txv74FiURYZM+LWRNNaOi7P2fQoIfsPotbokL/PHklE=; b=mU9UMyw9k9whLW04owYBX5Sm3mO9NLruD7gN5XJjXFlD4PHLO6FEkB9L LsCoD8bWo/Zxmmp6WOa0vT+yNbOvHGR4EPpj2zaS9P3KjlTNy3+wFumlI P1bon4jgCmG5QZ8pkpGLmsnzm/wm3I6Y1CC+ZXOgsQsftuZ3h+QM+srK8 I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DgAABuvRlZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBiS6KGHOQbJV1gg8Hhh0ChWwYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBg0IAQGKH6xMgiaKSQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBARIPiGiCcId1gmABBJ4KhA2CFIx6iwKGaZRDHziBCi8gCBkVhz4+iRUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,345,1491264000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="651870514"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2017 14:41:40 +0000
Received: from [10.61.248.17] ([10.61.248.17]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4FEfdpb015631; Mon, 15 May 2017 14:41:40 GMT
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <9a41874c-24e2-aa0c-e58c-7bee8b35f91b@cisco.com> <2247.1494795324@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <e83d3fe9-4394-b82a-0a75-008329ef62a8@cisco.com> <8359.1494857281@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8e365c06-99e5-e9f1-50d1-2e3558400248@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:41:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8359.1494857281@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Sp3XFj02lcR3rvM2SUCFIK2c60Nrc8HqX"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/Bw-lcTvH8TznQZgz66igSfjNbN4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:45:25 -0000

Michael,


On 5/15/17 4:08 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Yes, I know it's still in the document, but you cut it from the message.
>
> That matters wrt how the old and new text considers.  How can a lounge
> in a non-HQ Hotel be between the meeting room and hotel entrance if
> there are no meeting rooms in the overflow hotel?
>
>

Good point.  I now understand.  How about this:

OLD:

            At least one IETF Hotel has a space for use as a lounge,
            conducive to planned and ad hoc meetings and chatting, as well
            as working online. There are tables with seating, convenient for
            small meetings with laptops. These can be at an open bar or
casual
            restaurant. Preferably the lounge area is on the path
between the
            meeting rooms and the hotel entrance, and is available all
day and
            night.

NEW:

            At least one IETF Hotel has a space for use as a lounge,
            conducive to planned and ad hoc meetings and chatting, as well
            as working online. There are tables with seating, convenient for
            small meetings with laptops. These can be at an open bar or
casual
            restaurant. When a hotel is collocated with the Facility,
preferably the
            lounge area is on the path between the meeting rooms and the
hotel
            entrance, and is available all day and night.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email