IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 May 2017 05:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD30129C06 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 22:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECiLVatO7rX2 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 22:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x244.google.com (mail-wr0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84ED412751F for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 6so226366wrb.1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=3TsIn5+LkqhgmSBh9orU5IDiCK9mQ7FIeMHtHmqBn+c=; b=jDzl/KTMvwqiUXWqvLjZu/TAel5THE0GxJY+f9szi3TLdAmdEXSFk0/rew9E5RM47K +bGkOd7dw3whuLd5rC+SNermS6pZ/JLGidPqJPo3e3w2lEd4EwLtoM9v6s9hN1Too2He qVHhB28CHO1rO4r5V/kZmuzE/I9VYokSZDnRTL1fCN6zgb2SdlmnT8jqLgbyQIuWcOUp WzL5i2CgTGroIVFbf+szIXghr9U9rCJ7EyAPbtYd4mSV1wBRBVTfCqSPSglektF8qb0d Y4Fs4cJX+f7/I5gJdrq312imwSkHN4u9K6S09sYxTTUNGRI443+Atrqv5RbWJviIw8K/ e0Aw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=3TsIn5+LkqhgmSBh9orU5IDiCK9mQ7FIeMHtHmqBn+c=; b=W0BblO5Phl58C63baca2b3boDxK8GQu9R72k+N+JMDOmKIoXnGQSqTe7L3LLRdDFMw oAereJIN9oWcKATuFm+iTOUW5g5fDNUB5rCIhYYvxpArbZg8HQK/J/Um6ZbYZ/XesuUX YG6bvQWXoUjySI0uhT5QXCDK3zKWLskJVdQ04HSdTWs4RRVlTRZww2FyFtWSSE01IBlR ejuvcTht8s6aon6/3EgBA9Z4BJeJobhuem3SVSY0cagNJKXVx/2H7hqLyBzkJk/UW6rb bhGNfkKUQQcWbUhqf/F2wZDWWNNtxTiCCgRaV843vFCNTSNVVj/sAxngzfBrBTAwxwOd tOdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBog2sFworjcaoUpHdp3LWYTW+I1hzVY1MeBMX/ADSRZRNgPB9o jhrQDcDAzJPIWg==
X-Received: by 10.223.163.158 with SMTP id l30mr1001083wrb.174.1495000391118; Tue, 16 May 2017 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from users-mbp.mshome.net ([176.13.20.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm2317394wra.1.2017.05.16.22.53.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 May 2017 22:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <453A5298-F828-4D8F-A64F-5961C6331FF4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3F75AE0A-9B19-4243-8513-B37452D7F91F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 08:52:57 +0300
In-Reply-To: <8b6181d6-6837-9f3c-e6bd-e0dd1ed071bc@cisco.com>
Cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <9a41874c-24e2-aa0c-e58c-7bee8b35f91b@cisco.com> <0383F38B-FCA6-4144-9501-9F990B6A2910@consulintel.es> <8b6181d6-6837-9f3c-e6bd-e0dd1ed071bc@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/ZXiomXB2RxH1gXJfX1njD41u7wA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 05:57:09 -0000

> On 16 May 2017, at 14:29, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jordi,
> 
> 
> On 5/15/17 8:37 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> At least one of the IETF meeting facilities has a space for use as a lounge …
>> 
> 
> I think this is the wisest approach.

+1.  This seems to have the least chance of causing the nightmare scenario where every hotel visited triggers a response that “Does this count? Maybe we should send a floorplan to the IETF list and ask everyone.”

The point is to empower the people making the selections, not to make every hotel an exception that has to be run by the whole IETF.

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email