IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48722129B16 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 May 2017 23:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgWWcYMtWo78 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 May 2017 23:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgl-iport-2.cisco.com (bgl-iport-2.cisco.com [72.163.197.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7ED12778D for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 May 2017 23:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2331; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494828377; x=1496037977; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qR3atGtwj19i0JBE1h3MmKPUoLu9aYhjOYg7YYUZgMs=; b=L28+PdGTh3jNo0iU5NZPuuCDF5s80BndfAhurxJweT3sxY6H6g027Exi EMBxlTmMWi+YoyNZ0hEWgZ8hFtsESSOLJrFtnnOU1hD9waFkBM7J7YEOB yq5vTmzwCHMiYfJyUT6Egwl+yAnrLHu/5eHr6P4UWNA+cPzCuGD/RpWCL 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DxAAAWRBlZ/xjFo0hcGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhUODa4oYc5BJIZV1gg8Hhh0ChVoYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBg0GAgEBih+tEIImikYBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBARAPiGgLgmWHdYJgAQSeCoQNghSMeosChmmUQx84gQovIAgZFYc+PjaIXwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,343,1491264000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="70820199"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-2.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2017 06:06:13 +0000
Received: from [10.61.82.216] (ams3-vpn-dhcp4825.cisco.com [10.61.82.216]) by bgl-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4F66Cfw007278; Mon, 15 May 2017 06:06:13 GMT
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <9a41874c-24e2-aa0c-e58c-7bee8b35f91b@cisco.com> <2247.1494795324@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e83d3fe9-4394-b82a-0a75-008329ef62a8@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:06:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2247.1494795324@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rpawteQLOxmSoa5TLrLFiMXA1cOc8wo6g"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/UyM6ehh9tLGMGIcVM7o_TM3eBnY>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 06:11:06 -0000

Hi Michael,



On 5/14/17 10:55 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>     > Returning to this issue, I noted that there really was only one
>     > significant reference to the headquarters hotel.  As such, what I
>     > propose to do is remove the definition and state the following:
>
>     > OLD:
>     >> The Headquarters Hotel has a space for use as a lounge, [...]
>     > NEW:
>     >> At least one IETF Hotel has a space for use as a lounge, [...]
>
> So, you cut some context:
>       These can be at an open bar or casual
>       restaurant.  Preferably the lounge area is on the path between the
>       meeting rooms and the hotel entrance, and is available all day
>       and night.

No that text still appears in the document.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email