IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] About draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 16 October 2018 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6FB130DFD for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unipubclZ8cF for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAD3130DF3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717041E116F for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:45:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id COjTgrgCpE0jMCOjTgIO0H; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:45:55 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wAt6jqcSwIcn3vcF4rI6unWe+Q7Vl8XankmY0MOa24U=; b=nuRehFQNoc7mBAKmDucEctLRXs zEtYndAGe4iumnqqo5uESnwP7kVaEwO9Hxrji/jl5Q7WPK+K/V3eklQx3lMiAn49jB2qDAJlG1bMg 2H94myZru3mtOTgLOxtRFs/aG;
Received: from pool-100-15-106-211.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.106.211]:41027 helo=[11.4.0.65]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1gCOE5-0038M9-Kn; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:13:29 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
CC: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:13:26 -0400
Message-ID: <1667ccb8a70.27ce.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <328e9dfe-8e30-6388-68be-95b55af0a5b0@cisco.com>
References: <328e9dfe-8e30-6388-68be-95b55af0a5b0@cisco.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.16.0-1193 (build: 101600006)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.106.211
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1gCOE5-0038M9-Kn
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-106-211.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.4.0.65]) [100.15.106.211]:41027
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 11
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/HnBFXNReZK-bkj-_WQThLdBUKSQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] About draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:46:04 -0000

Hi Eliot,

Given the LLC is more specific than, i.e., part of, IASA why is this change 
needed or even a good idea?

Lou


----------
On October 16, 2018 7:28:37 AM Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> The meeting selection document is now with the RFC editor and is in
> AUTH48 state.  Since last call, the IETF LLC has come into existence,
> and the IASA as previously described is no longer relevant.  Therefore,
> some changes are needed to the final draft of the document.  These edits
> largely amount to replacing the IASA with the LLC.  However, I draw your
> attention to  one part of the text that has changed substantially: the
> appeal mechanisms open to  community members have changed.  This is
> primarily due to the nature of the relationship between the
> organizations, and how LLC board members are selected.
>    
> You can find a diff of what was approved by the IESG and what is now
> with  the RFC editor at the following link:
>    
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8491-auth48diff.html
>    
> Barring serious objections, I will give the RFC editor my "Okidoke" for
> this work by the end of the week.
>
> Eliot
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email