Re: [Mtgvenue] testing draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process against the venue change that just occurred

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63D6131488; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awjwkw_nvON6; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940A01316C3; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-8909.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8909.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v6IAhrtl093567 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 05:43:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>
References: <27b1a6a1-5dfc-6403-1d24-3171f7dba74a@cisco.com> <20170718094546.pcu4mx6ezxdo3k7c@mx4.yitter.info> <E4BE06F7-1886-4734-846A-7F95D874D315@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <764472f5-29d6-5c1c-3fd6-35d9db81f32e@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:43:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E4BE06F7-1886-4734-846A-7F95D874D315@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/MTlS3Ob5APYaamIfQGUI2C0l2_k>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] testing draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process against the venue change that just occurred
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:44:02 -0000

On 7/18/17 11:59, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> So my understanding is actually that the venue was chanced because of the uncertainty we currently have about the travel restrictions that may occur in future. So I actually think it does not match the bulletpoint on travel restrictions that is cited below.
>
> Also how do we know that 60 people or more will be effected (despite the fact that we are taking about potential further changes that may happen in future but did not happen yet).

My understanding is that this was based on the 15% number that Leslie 
cited in her recent announcement:

> 15% of those living outside the US who responded to the survey said they were so concerned about US travel restrictions that they decided not to attend IETF 98 in Chicago.

Prediction is hard business; however, it's been pointed out to me that 
"tomorrow will be the same as today" is frequently as good a predictor 
for weather as an actual, well-sourced forecast.

/a