IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] visa situation... worsens?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 24 March 2017 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B52131485 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yfzWDnVDtkWi for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762C9131482 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n11so3538826wma.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+mw9+Rvj2/yOUvyo5FMTO3/yAjolGWpKD2/curh7CpQ=; b=R726f8cMH9QtFxIic1s/+ng7Jc39BDQ7IbQgeG+8RQ8v2I7syMnE5GS7tl7XGzOEEk 58XSamlhoeI6ew2OQiGN2lG94Ipclj0BWrbFwpkf/cZ8khnRDW69vvO4uaBf3pqtGchb tQKm7NYsIaEj+Hcn8FRNQz06wSJk/aFHheyKtTb4l47VQnkANHtN82KGXpYsExY8vLod 7/mBzShXS74QZgpmbgZI/Y6KeoVmDgEz5avBviqkf4e0DTcS6Xp8JKffsV2t18pEta7E bU72uk/qDRj3aeXNd1RuMJQmU3bwLD5cFpdpKrzLDGN8wrBdHX4nbw4z6Mm69nO193t0 Q0yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+mw9+Rvj2/yOUvyo5FMTO3/yAjolGWpKD2/curh7CpQ=; b=awgq+fV0GK6a1yEsucaw3Ar8nZjcHDoNpE5Kb+p67DNUu84Pe4Tg5NeLMYSTHVdtNO apz0QMBkMV2hYv9R1OFYBPIm9Hdi7Bvr62nAb3beKOAQBTxw6th1CKizK5zX+4Boik71 S0LPw/bZYfs8jR/ej9SgC8lx0amvo7eL2/c3zmxup9YtZfC3eqhTXni9kUTAt/lHoVQH YJPSer15T3Ch/p3szPWt4v6uNc54aTjU2OAQBb5mGuguF6R/bOk2KDFb3LnHwBzxCMkt Fz2iW71JfdedsvyLiyv6VBDQG49mxEJ8DHBqXg+v2lqZEtT0YuoruWtPPD+JNlUBmLjP 96YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0H2RAczPJn9khpZcwN52fwtWjHDrOzj9qkcbngGZ3ckVSbnv4aiX7nSpWCs0wMTw==
X-Received: by 10.28.51.140 with SMTP id z134mr3505934wmz.55.1490365255002; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:a5d6:e7fe:280:7cb9? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:a5d6:e7fe:280:7cb9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p7sm3083812wrc.19.2017.03.24.07.20.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <6515D523-5102-447F-9A37-53366C5F2BFE@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A352E8C4-8643-4452-B802-353299C630B0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:20:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <86357066-b5c3-7d4b-3012-92ae63a3f22d@dcrocker.net>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, mtgvenue <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
References: <2805.1490212930@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAKe6YvNXAucSABZrc84SQEmhevcV3O5Ft3hxKcgg94rvt7kdTg@mail.gmail.com> <97F88D1C-6940-40AA-BACC-10F568E61BB1@consulintel.es> <86357066-b5c3-7d4b-3012-92ae63a3f22d@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/kX18abvqfy8SPhGVAIl0kcYkJBE>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] visa situation... worsens?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:20:59 -0000

> On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Agree, we should definitively STOP completely doing meetings in US while this situation keeps going on.
> 
> 
> If there are folk who believe that the IETF should continue to hold meetings in the US, it might be helpful for them to post comments here, supporting that view.

Or more specifically, the San Francisco meeting.  That the meeting we need to make a decision on soon.

Thanks,
Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email