Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Suresh:
> 
>  Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline.
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 7:47 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for putting this document together.  I have two minor comments.
>> 
>> First, in Section 2 the document says:
>> 
>>  Please note that the boundaries between those regions has been
>>  purposefully left undefined per WG consensus.
>> 
>> As a BCP, I think it would be more valuable to simply say:
>> 
>>  The boundaries between regions is purposefully left ambiguous.
> 
> Sounds good. Will make this change.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Second, at the end of Section 2, the document says:
>> 
>>  How often we intend to do such meetings in the future should also be
>>  an open topic for discussion within the community.
>> 
>> I think the document should nail down who makes this decision.  I suggest:
>> 
>>  The timing and frequency of such exploratory meetings in the future
>>  is left to the IETF Chair, after discussion with the IESG and the
>>  community.
> 
> Sounds good. Does this text work?
> 
> "The timing and frequency of such exploratory meetings in the future will be based on IETF consensus as determined by the IETF chair”

Works for me.

Russ