IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multipathtcp] Two proxy scenario (network proxy off path)

"Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5593612947E for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdFzA0x9jc-k for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0542126DDF for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cvRrQqoE1h6HxvMszfFp3Hxb89M3ZssJGKQdPNMQWxA=; b=kyRq0Qd4Kf/vmYscsNaJERkJu+VZ9lYtJ2fTsGnQR2VJec0JETMzvyRNH2ylAGxZrVlYe5fw5SViM1rvfLQ1Z2vzI2LY9q1u2nDKow01sEyVfO/yzQ/zPhAkwtlyrnF0E3k/kV72od9EuI6ztt5/X65kITd59lHNCZu4AvJP2rM=
Received: from AM2PR07MB0961.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.37.144) by AM2PR07MB0963.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.37.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.991.4; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:07:49 +0000
Received: from AM2PR07MB0961.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a1c4:2e6c:8c63:20f1]) by AM2PR07MB0961.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a1c4:2e6c:8c63:20f1%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.010; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:07:48 +0000
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
To: "Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be" <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>, "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, "cpaasch@apple.com" <cpaasch@apple.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
CC: "multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [multipathtcp] Two proxy scenario (network proxy off path)
Thread-Index: AQHSqKEzn5tV/NId30ibC6ujzmAk2aGr8+qA//+tSoCAAFToAIAACkFSgAAEI4CAABDYAP//5pyA
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:07:48 +0000
Message-ID: <BA3F4B12-433B-4BA1-B5BC-CBD7A3D6D6E6@nokia.com>
References: <70EAECD3-22A6-420A-B84C-04B0673020DF@nokia.com> <20170329153901.GF2779@dhcp-8507.meeting.ietf.org> <3D71318E-8644-4FB3-8C7F-9DD4E5AFE89B@nokia.com> <20170329154652.GG2779@dhcp-8507.meeting.ietf.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E4303A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170329162327.GH2779@dhcp-8507.meeting.ietf.org> <4d63da0dd6594a67b39b8d5d2f252abb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <165d5f12-884e-b823-45ee-a9f755b2270c@uclouvain.be>
In-Reply-To: <165d5f12-884e-b823-45ee-a9f755b2270c@uclouvain.be>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
authentication-results: uclouvain.be; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;uclouvain.be; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [135.245.212.7]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM2PR07MB0963; 7:aBC5iP6Z0y5c9oYLin9gWZi+fqW9LsDk3wB/UYr0QQiyk+9GIEDSb0TtJt57Md3U2dX9PuuFY1/RRd/xW3I25WwzNJ7rrPExUI+nDZYBANFkw4Z1ZWyVFLDAnHr7gTqRu5vdHxNT3dHA/ehvLapxG8Cm9acDEx50+KkyNcQnNf5l/cAqHZrRPVjdPH56B/86G526UyGh6ZuSuTeuS8H1oFBzbaa84JiJFi3QTB0PBWQnwIuNaztUf7w76FHo4aIS07qpEnF9/TNXhYAK03tiTP/mFKvETtT3m+fzkO2mg0+bTU1xc/qusMgP36oyx7H3Y1KeemBYTWlFK/wj0wXjMA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 950d9461-4bf8-4396-5a29-08d476e7a788
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0963;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM2PR07MB09630B55CA188501750221F083350@AM2PR07MB0963.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(146908506813832);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123558025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406075)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0963; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM2PR07MB0963;
x-forefront-prvs: 0261CCEEDF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(24454002)(66066001)(50986999)(76176999)(54356999)(99286003)(8666007)(2950100002)(82746002)(3280700002)(6506006)(561944003)(6486002)(6436002)(7736002)(305945005)(2906002)(53936002)(5660300001)(36756003)(4001350100001)(6116002)(2900100001)(6512007)(38730400002)(3846002)(102836003)(6306002)(81166006)(5250100002)(2201001)(83506001)(53546009)(25786009)(8936002)(4326008)(93886004)(83716003)(189998001)(3660700001)(6246003)(229853002)(8676002)(33656002)(86362001)(2501003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM2PR07MB0963; H:AM2PR07MB0961.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E863EF81C8DA7748BD3656B46030DFED@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Mar 2017 21:07:48.4617 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR07MB0963
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/6TR4OFOLf0T9APHdJK777OZDBI8>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Two proxy scenario (network proxy off path)
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:07:54 -0000


On 29/03/2017, 12:38, "Olivier Bonaventure" <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be> wrote:

    On 29/03/17 18:38, philip.eardley@bt.com wrote:
    > << The point I am trying to make is that a 0-RTT proxying solution is not something that the MPTCP working-group should be in charge of. There are other places in the IETF that are probably more appropriate for this.>>
    > If possible the WG can discuss a solution for a while without worrying about this - at least to get to a protocol model that we like. then we (or rather Mirja & IESG) can worry about Whether this needs a re-charter, another wg involved etc
    
    I agree that there could be other use cases than MPTCP and that the main 
    objective is to have 0-RTT proxying solution. Several members of this 
    group have worked on MPTCP proxies and there is sufficient demand from 
    various network operators to justify a specification that ensures that 
    different implementations are interoperable. Given the experience that 
    we have in this group with MPTCP proxies, it would make sense to discuss 
    here first. There are already deployments and operators expect to have 
    interoperablt solutions soon.
    

WH> agreed, lets focus on MPTCP for this proposal and lets get interoperability.
    
    Olivier
    
    _______________________________________________
    multipathtcp mailing list
    multipathtcp@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email