Re: [multipathtcp] Possible future items for mptcp WG

Hi Xavier,

Thank you so much!
Yes, we have thought about 5G stuff as well.
The reason why we haven't included in the list below was it might not be a
short term topic while it can be important for mptcp in future.
New suggestions to mptcp with regard to this topic will always be very
welcome.
--
Yoshi

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Xavier de Foy <x.defoy.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yoshifumi & Phil,
>
>   Another potential item under "Feature Extensions" could be dedicated to
> interoperability with 5G. We are preparing an update to the "5G
> considerations" draft presented in the last session, which can be used as
> input for the group to decide if it should be on this list.
>
>   Best Regards,
> Xavier
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Phil and I have been discussing the next step for the WG.
>> After we finish 6824bis, we ｗon't have active WG items as the proxy work
>> will be discussed at tcpm WG.
>> One suggestion might be to close the WG or to put it in dormant state,
>> however, we are thinking there still might be some more working items as
>> we've seen interesting presentations for new ideas, experiment results
>> and so on at the meetings and on the ML.
>>
>> Below is the list of potential working items from the chairs' point of
>> view.
>> Please let us know if you think some of them are important items for the
>> WG (and your willingness to contribute if possible) or there are some
>> more items, or this is not something we should work on, etc.
>>
>> Also, if you have some opinions on the status of the WG or suggestions to
>> the chairs, please let us hear!
>>
>> We appreciate your feedback
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Yoshi & Phil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1: API extensions (This is already in our charter)
>>     draft-hesmans-mptcp-socket
>>     draft-samar-mptcp-socketapi
>>
>> 2: Feature extensions
>>     a) robust initial setup
>>         proposed by Markus, also Kien presented a similar idea
>>
>>     b) fast subflow setup
>>         proposed by Quentin
>>
>>     c) security enhancement
>>         1) TLS
>>             draft-bonaventure-mptcp-tls-00
>>             draft-paasch-mptcp-tls-authentication-00
>>
>>         2) Utilize proposals from tcpinc?
>>
>>         3) Elliptic Curve Cryptography
>>             draft-kim-mptcp-semptcp-00
>>
>>     d) Solutions for operational issues
>>          1) how to handle nat64 issue proposed by Quentin
>>          2) how to handle load balancer proposed by Fabien, Christoph,
>> Costin
>>
>> 3: Congestion Control (This topic itself should probably be discussed at
>> ICCRG. But, it may trigger some updates of the protocol or APIs later)
>>      a) OLIA
>>           draft-khalili-mptcp-congestion-control-05
>>
>>      b) mptcp + BBR?
>>           presented by Jing
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> multipathtcp mailing list
>> multipathtcp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
>>
>>
>