Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration

[Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>]

I don't remember why it changed. One tends to think of the "logical"
order as being from-to. But I would note that, to put the most
critical information earliest, address fields are normally to-from,
that is, "destination-source". Perhaps it was changed in analogy to
that.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 [e-mail]



On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Edward Lewis <[e-mail]> wrote:
> At 15:13 +0000 1/2/12, <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> as for ordering, Ed may chime in anyday now...
>
>
> Since you asked...the order was set before my time.  (DNSSEC was in
> discussion for about 2 years before I joined TIS.)  I don't know the
> rationale behind the ordering.  It does seem "odd" - but to me that's just
> the way it has always been.
>
> Maybe Olafur, Brian, Donald, Jim Galvin and/or others (Gilmore?) might know.
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis
> NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at [phone]
>
> Vote for the word of the day:
> "Papa"razzi - father that constantly takes photos of the baby
> Corpureaucracy - The institution of corporate "red tape"
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext