IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Wed, 04 January 2012 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F2921F860D; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1325663298; bh=KHntufbncEayyQ+AmtO5IrfqcyOnZFAfAQPZvC5ZLfY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=zIRL0oddrR4pBZFqDN3eNq2aSnilBZLplXTpBzecyQzR1Z0a0MoQwe14whr12Vgnt e0kNIZ9ZgurbOhCQkInusFEl9uFHt2avhlGG+O9yWeS+3hfI6z3uuKW5ytdtwOJDak YVeyEqhFUKkn1XxEDZbfE8DNv/kfv/JXJiTLvizE=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F4E21F860D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uj7JXkk7dlh8 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F089921F85CC for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0E353FF2F; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:48:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:48:08 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120104074808.GA27592@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20120102104613.GB12764@miek.nl> <4F0373E5.1000207@ogud.com> <20120103220324.GA395@vacation.karoshi.com.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120103220324.GA395@vacation.karoshi.com.>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7552722312079534377=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

[ Quoting <bmanning@vacation.karoshi> at 22:03 on Jan  3 in "Re: [dnsext] SIG inc..." ]
> > my first DNSSEC code written in fall 1994 (signer) did not inter operate 
> > with later code (resolver spring 1995) and the reason was the order 
> > change and I always coded from current drafts.
> 
> 	gahhh... should I pull out my code fm that era?

Why not? I'm curious.

Regards,
Miek

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email