[dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- next steps?
Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Fri, 09 March 2012 13:22 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9206221F8642; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:22:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1331299347; bh=U/34Jt7W7O7MoNIgZniePvWCRQkTKXhDiKpBD6LGMow=; h=From:Message-Id:To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=fkwHfJ0Tj8Txh6PgqvHvsKmCN8DbinDu6Y+oSl+2QKrpt+r24zRrMOxUJZO0YTAG0 k7JDqOD9sLIfB0JG4F/BWi5yCJQuRvGqh75d3egLyMGTQv1vSFy/O8tLO5IbfOQ/C6 jscZxavoTD4KdIkkwesFi1y8QU5cd+9Z/iA4OXQI=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E0521F8642 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SlEBgX6hpAKe for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F026821F85D2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA149379281; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:21:21 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id OAA28689; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:21:20 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <201203091321.OAA28689@TR-Sys.de>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:21:20 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- next steps?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
DNSEXT folks, draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 represents the latest step in the process started with the IETF 78 meeting discussion that lead to the encouragement/invitation to me and Ondrej to prepare an updated specification document for IXFR that at once integrates Ondrej Sury and Shane Kerr's IXFR-ONLY proposal, in fulfillment of a chartered work item thence calling for work on revised specifications for DNS zone synchronization mechanisms (in the interim re-worded to explicitly mention IXFR-ONLY). On the mailing list and at the Prague meeting, the draft has repeatedly been offered to the WG for adoption as a WG draft, but the discussion every time has prematurely evaded into elaborations on details instead of deciding on adaption first, as envisioned in the Working Group Procedures RFCs. Now, given the efforts already put into the development of the document, and given the impending closure of DNSEXT, we see two possible paths to follow: A) The WG quickly (on-list and/or in Paris) comes to affirmative consensus on I-D adaption. In this case, we can quickly re-post the I-D as a WG draft (once I-D submission re-opens during IETF), if that is deemed necessary under the given circumstances. We would then like the chairs to immediately issue a formal WGLC call for the document, in order to quickly proceed in the fulfillment of the last open chartered work item of DNSEXT. B) Otherwise. In this case, we intend to proceed with the draft as an individual, AD-sponsored draft -- and Andrew already has indicated his willingness to actively support this path. We'd then like the chairs to organize and quickly execute a pseudo-WGLC for the present draft version on the dnsext list. Given the perceived exhaustiveness of the discussion last held summer and the apparent rough technical consensus achieved, and also seeing the support of multiple active operators and implementers for the draft, we do not expect significant changes to be necessary, but are willing to quickly produce one more draft version before approching a suitable AD with a publication request for the draft. We hope that, backed by the pseudo-WGLC, the process could be smooth and fast, leading to an IETF-wide LC before IESG processing. To this end, we'd like to solicit quick feedback on how to proceed. Also speaking for Ondrej (and inofficially for Shane Kerr as well, the co-author of the original IXFR-ONLY proposal backing us up a bit behind the scenes), Alfred. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- ne… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -… Warren Kumari