Re: [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- next steps?
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 09 March 2012 19:20 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED7B21F8673; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:20:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1331320828; bh=ilDhqiT1L5a4Ncd3oIcZSuqWEw8ignToWslxstfBCH8=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=lSDeuz/B0wFFU+Bg9i9Zzs3WAV/PScXHHrn7kZ9Tnrvxjc7eAL3sPCP1KhKZVPmZO fx15K9NolSb9maA3Y/aDDqjWa8C+yInbsNOLtRS+6qxxpN7ZB8UV9KTPx96o6xsXer uO5966XvSC/01RW0n804nG1LZpf9Ny/frOv3jQ/k=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F288321F8629 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:20:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAG6yn-wTRKo for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9901321F8617 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-172-19-119-93.cbf.corp.google.com (unknown [64.13.52.115]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFF1B1B41BBA; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:20:25 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <201203091321.OAA28689@TR-Sys.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:20:23 -0500
Message-Id: <99A58E22-5626-42EA-9C95-D9C884D095E9@kumari.net>
References: <201203091321.OAA28689@TR-Sys.de>
To: Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- next steps?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
On Mar 9, 2012, at 8:21 AM, Alfred HÎnes wrote: > DNSEXT folks, > > [ SNIP ] > > A) The WG quickly (on-list and/or in Paris) comes to affirmative > consensus on I-D adaption. I have read (and discussed) the draft and (still) support adoption.... W > > In this case, we can quickly re-post the I-D as a WG draft > (once I-D submission re-opens during IETF), if that is deemed > necessary under the given circumstances. > > We would then like the chairs to immediately issue a formal > WGLC call for the document, in order to quickly proceed in > the fulfillment of the last open chartered work item of DNSEXT. > > B) Otherwise. > > In this case, we intend to proceed with the draft as an > individual, AD-sponsored draft -- and Andrew already has > indicated his willingness to actively support this path. > > We'd then like the chairs to organize and quickly execute a > pseudo-WGLC for the present draft version on the dnsext list. > > Given the perceived exhaustiveness of the discussion last held > summer and the apparent rough technical consensus achieved, > and also seeing the support of multiple active operators and > implementers for the draft, we do not expect significant changes > to be necessary, but are willing to quickly produce one more > draft version before approching a suitable AD with a publication > request for the draft. We hope that, backed by the pseudo-WGLC, > the process could be smooth and fast, leading to an IETF-wide LC > before IESG processing. > > > To this end, we'd like to solicit quick feedback on how to proceed. > > > Also speaking for Ondrej (and inofficially for Shane Kerr as well, > the co-author of the original IXFR-ONLY proposal backing us up a bit > behind the scenes), > > Alfred. > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext > _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -- ne… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-03 -… Warren Kumari