IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 28 February 2011 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9504B3A6C85; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:11:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244C33A6C8F for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:11:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ss7oFswDmq3F for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F953A6C85 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so3499720qwh.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/tmD8g/RRhVUTy+zTy2QoCXqV+c5dJAxsUNgpen4Z8Y=; b=ZCHNYkG/SvWF5/Xw2lwndpGS8gKf0LYWf1swBddKCF4N/Gmo3E5OloALpZxCg4sVOL TOtqp2W5khBRtpftLgf454vcaVO2K5lRc7nv61BGdD7yg4nGju5quVlLaiNy0Vrpc/Lo Jzrt+rpSW3VYvfY3M/VIsA2VDx57DDlOW2SIU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=h/s6iyR/x8viQ0GRfR4tKY/POdekRvs1hyBrXKshKu6tXSJu701dN5P2lnTvUpjPZN bBA1oQiEVPBv75KW8JUjknqEzUvtddVgLvQEP8v8whAas+3yKPkYxgusBvssuY5sT4rc ee65jkHI0oBB9bvwi6tFkuIRksKdhalU+QnYc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.220.133 with SMTP id hy5mr4614619qcb.269.1298923936770; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.98.210 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D6BFCA0.80806@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
References: <20110227182720.6537.qmail@joyce.lan> <552AB7D12FAB50296E795CF5@Ximines.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102271336340.6604@joyce.lan> <AF3A2DE418832E7A91CD07A5@Ximines.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102271457570.7355@joyce.lan> <AANLkTi=DLzBEQFLqAmPccbdt63LDSp1cRzShnYkuiDQB@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikJvkK27huT0FSQ=1DF2HS1hwUS3TL1u988h8gN@mail.gmail.com> <4D6BE4D6.3030103@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <AANLkTimaSvbs00TCevsPH5ZX43TzuPk7VXO7Fo3qFdhM@mail.gmail.com> <4D6BFCA0.80806@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:12:16 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=LsH61za0p_zS1uB48LG6AFHYb2uEcBBh7KgkJ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:
> do you seriously think phillip was contemplating playing shuttlecock with a
> pair of labels, one GB, one Big5?
>
> i didn't.
>

Keeping the language consistent helps.  That's all my request was intended for.

regards,

Ted Hardie
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email