Re: [ncrg] Request to make the Framework draft an RG document

Rana Sircar <sircar.rana@gmail.com> Wed, 09 January 2013 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sircar.rana@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAF721F8488 for <ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:42:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.714
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.714 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmyhQiH53Xoh for <ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f53.google.com (mail-da0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FF521F8477 for <ncrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x6so780859dac.26 for <ncrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:42:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nxYGYhEx9ZFqIwRohoi9CJ+OpU29LrOJR4ASWVCs/qs=; b=AEh5cNT+h/nPH+8BynlqV1iJpyJpg44XWyMqebcIEtpko8BAh5ZItXt+MNle52I2lt OasxzWpdCmDQHx+QqotwFvU/4qZnae+0SJ/9yujV+ZCAzUymVnJqqlz8OeYhcTZYelyR pGjGzRfNu+Qyhdjl7wdMAYp3HTmCkdAzIb9OLXNFz2XmW8JQxOPemlCbTO/rr+8+UpnV jaKPWdAsGUQ1J5B6bH/A+5WIvPNDgQt52U2ZYaNhsYYdzwkKD6zfeW1VXbw590AzYX+8 xPGQ8yx41w0P8xqmvDwf086qSmc2VEKt20K+6XVnSxw0xDnGpDdrg4coREq+U2hcDDxO tnrQ==
Received: by 10.66.88.198 with SMTP id bi6mr190173070pab.54.1357742530740; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:42:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.73.167 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:41:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F693AF1@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F693AF1@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
From: Rana Sircar <sircar.rana@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:11:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPjPJcm-PdF5ifF_azVsoMEojDL8Q1tK5EZsc=G7nc9AddNJPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042de4233dc1b104d2dc11d7
Cc: "ncrg@irtf.org" <ncrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [ncrg] Request to make the Framework draft an RG document
X-BeenThere: ncrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Complexity Research Group <ncrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ncrg>, <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ncrg>
List-Post: <mailto:ncrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ncrg>, <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:42:13 -0000

Dear Michael,

I think that it is a good idea to make the framework document into a RG
document and also issue a new version.

A side question - are you planing to have a session as part of IETF 86 in
Orlando? If so, I would try to attend the same.

Best Regards,
Rana Pratap Sircar
GSM+919899003705|


On 9 January 2013 16:21, Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehring@cisco.com>wrote;wrote:

> Geoff and I had a call a couple of days ago. We're planning to re-spin the
> framework draft, take in the inputs received, and issue a new version.
>
> This new version should be issued as an IRTF document
> (draft-irtf-ncrg-..). While there is no formal process in the IRTF on how
> to make a document an rg document, let's apply the usual IETF policy here.
>
> Thus: Who is in favour of making the framework draft an RG document?
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behringer-complexity-framework/
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncrg mailing list
> ncrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ncrg
>