[ncrg] Request to make the Framework draft an RG document

"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Wed, 09 January 2013 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9CB21F85C8 for <ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:51:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.524
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4FMO16Xbm5y for <ncrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5321F85BC for <ncrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:51:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=523; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1357728666; x=1358938266; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=G1iJjzS/uTp9YUls3rFsqUvEJDYvDaKY19Uws42u+H8=; b=FNNHJsgq1MfcXWc7onn4K/2b9PBw782jm499n+Em6FIW1K4aRXsSY55D UR/ynJw3OpZpjr1770V9e7v5oJDq8DGGgd7aDmNbOrdK2V6coH1tdn++C uyDNqdAoLTAvfXOHzV4rds7CvQNbDk+IeKQEF7OBfjTr16rd2Al04ApBc 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEFAMhK7VCtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABEhXK3YBZzgiABBDpRASoUQiYBBBuIDwyXY54lkC9hA5cojy2CdIIm
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,436,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="160426779"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2013 10:51:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r09Ap51C021783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ncrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:51:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 04:51:05 -0600
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: "ncrg@irtf.org" <ncrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Request to make the Framework draft an RG document
Thread-Index: Ac3uVy6sB61Gz5nVQqipQnnl1bYRKg==
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:51:04 +0000
Message-ID: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F693AF1@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [ncrg] Request to make the Framework draft an RG document
X-BeenThere: ncrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Complexity Research Group <ncrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ncrg>, <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ncrg>
List-Post: <mailto:ncrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ncrg>, <mailto:ncrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:51:07 -0000

Geoff and I had a call a couple of days ago. We're planning to re-spin the framework draft, take in the inputs received, and issue a new version. 

This new version should be issued as an IRTF document (draft-irtf-ncrg-..). While there is no formal process in the IRTF on how to make a document an rg document, let's apply the usual IETF policy here. 

Thus: Who is in favour of making the framework draft an RG document?