Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nea@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A30E0822 for <nea@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x7-R0n+z5i9R for <nea@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A899E072E for <nea@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so5165970fxm.31 for <nea@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HgXnL89QOWaRgVdSNJNI46wl0ZE8RRq5dwAMYFhSWyA=; b=iuy8wlFsoxLon2/Uq4RMdzp1VEdDD4PH/oPuZxrdHj7VsI9zbJlc3AnE06KhpuNbwF 6ZGG5OBgea0ZocKaYYoPu81OkjfIyktJ8huZZnjF6Pehpow12JD3J9oCloP+DDGq9UcO jlvvcPhmhGXgRZ95ckGqUCJm9Z7oyNYgyhJHA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=r4pMFdMZ1+vI5+DNqRt+iEU/xv8d++9iMURLAQr3EZtNvkJd3HAaviSKRHsZ9Yzgh3 HWpleIrM31eQwz7k6SDlGpNpIjGswU0pI1tDCZcIzqZ6+uR4+/4dtIqRFs45r4r+P1Pv 83bI5/eCPJ8yKPgIJnmRK73yfTINRv7NTYAes=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.99.153 with SMTP id u25mr109601fan.112.1302631081419; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.114.77 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <043901FAFD488D44ACC9CCED00470BDC04B29BEB@XMB-RCD-105.cisco.com>
References: <043901FAFD488D44ACC9CCED00470BDC04B29BEB@XMB-RCD-105.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:58:01 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikf5mXXX-U=k624m_n37O2WkaKqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
To: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso@cisco.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015174beb46e1a60004a0bc6e99"
Cc: nea@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:06:07 -0000

Support

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
Christmas through April:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Susan Thomson (sethomso) <
sethomso@cisco.com> wrote:

> At IETF80, there was a discussion on next steps regarding the individual
> submissions for a TLS/TCP-based PT, and an EAP-based PT.
>
> Specifically, there are 2 proposals for a TLS/TCP-based transport
> documented in the following I-Ds:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sangster-nea-pt-tls-02.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cam-winget-eap-tlv-03.txt
>
> At the meeting, there was unanimous consensus to merge the TLS/TCP
> proposals in the above I-Ds as follows:
> - Support client authentication using the SASL framework
> - Support vendor extensions
> - Support error handling
>
> The authors of the above I-Ds have agreed to work on a joint WG
> submission.
>
> The chairs would like to verify this consensus on the mailing
> list. Please review the proposal and respond by Monday, 5pm PT on
> Apr 18. Indicate in your response whether you support the changes.
> If you support the changes, a one word response ("Support") is
> sufficient. If not, please explain your concerns and suggest how
> they could be resolved.
>
> Thanks
> Susan
> ----------------------------
>
> Note: No consensus has yet been reached on the EAP-based proposals, in
> particular, whether to use an EAP method or EAP-TLV for carrying posture
> information. The next step is to document the strengths and weaknesses
> of these 2 approaches to help make a decision.
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>