[Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT

"Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso@cisco.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sethomso@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: nea@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4419DE06B6 for <nea@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eE2Xw4tyhfY4 for <nea@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C677E0613 for <nea@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sethomso@cisco.com; l=1367; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302570992; x=1303780592; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:from:to; bh=BQxW1/bLmDdd0zOJCm8cSiQlIpQVH0SLJICd4xzu080=; b=gBBR6qwhh7rnyKNOL00uYCZ0VxpccKBDDzt/Ed2yTBsPFv2CKHm7X/kI 5bIMKOQeyW1kywwxvTgS4cZ3faNVst7tmpIs5cySS8FR5S297hOZGPHDU o58stM+Ms2lAzpCv1jjZBEt1gpzVfUosv1lsJEJDfeA3azM4BB619SMTr E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj8HAHKno02tJXG//2dsb2JhbACZBY0cd6UsnGOFbgSFW4tu
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,193,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="679365896"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2011 01:16:26 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3C1GQuR027710 for <nea@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:16:26 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-105.cisco.com ([72.163.62.147]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:16:26 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:16:25 -0500
Message-ID: <043901FAFD488D44ACC9CCED00470BDC04B29BEB@XMB-RCD-105.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
Thread-Index: Acv4rz3tc1/J9hl0R9y+k9A9ge1wCg==
From: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso@cisco.com>
To: nea@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2011 01:16:26.0175 (UTC) FILETIME=[3E8044F0:01CBF8AF]
Subject: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:16:34 -0000

At IETF80, there was a discussion on next steps regarding the individual
submissions for a TLS/TCP-based PT, and an EAP-based PT.

Specifically, there are 2 proposals for a TLS/TCP-based transport
documented in the following I-Ds:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sangster-nea-pt-tls-02.txt 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cam-winget-eap-tlv-03.txt

At the meeting, there was unanimous consensus to merge the TLS/TCP
proposals in the above I-Ds as follows:
- Support client authentication using the SASL framework
- Support vendor extensions
- Support error handling

The authors of the above I-Ds have agreed to work on a joint WG
submission.

The chairs would like to verify this consensus on the mailing 
list. Please review the proposal and respond by Monday, 5pm PT on 
Apr 18. Indicate in your response whether you support the changes. 
If you support the changes, a one word response ("Support") is 
sufficient. If not, please explain your concerns and suggest how 
they could be resolved.

Thanks
Susan
----------------------------

Note: No consensus has yet been reached on the EAP-based proposals, in
particular, whether to use an EAP method or EAP-TLV for carrying posture
information. The next step is to document the strengths and weaknesses
of these 2 approaches to help make a decision.